Advertisement
ESVIF vs NTNOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESVIF is a Hold and NTNOF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESVIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTNOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ESVIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NTNOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESVIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTNOF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ESVIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NTNOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
ESVIF (@Contract Drilling) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while NTNOF (@Contract Drilling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.16%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Contract Drilling (+1.38% weekly)The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.
| ESVIF | NTNOF | ESVIF / NTNOF | |
| Capitalization | 319M | 180M | 177% |
| EBITDA | 389M | 41.4M | 940% |
| Gain YTD | -12.136 | -8.815 | 138% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.51 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.67B | 216M | 773% |
| Total Cash | 15M | 28.1M | 53% |
| Total Debt | 998M | 548M | 182% |
ESVIF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ESVIF | NTNOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 33% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 9% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 8% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ICEIX | 25.61 | 0.16 | +0.63% |
| Macquarie International Core Eq I | |||
| PEVAX | 16.46 | 0.05 | +0.30% |
| PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity A | |||
| VZGRX | 65.85 | -0.20 | -0.30% |
| Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Gr Stk R6 | |||
| JCNCX | 25.49 | -0.17 | -0.66% |
| Janus Henderson Contrarian C | |||
| ICPAX | 7.12 | -0.06 | -0.84% |
| Integrity Mid-North American Resources A | |||
ESVIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESVIF has been loosely correlated with PDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESVIF jumps, then PDS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESVIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESVIF | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| PDS - ESVIF | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| SDRL - ESVIF | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| HP - ESVIF | 44% Loosely correlated | -4.31% | ||
| NE - ESVIF | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| PTEN - ESVIF | 42% Loosely correlated | -6.57% | ||
More | ||||
NTNOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NTNOF and ESVIF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTNOF and ESVIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTNOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTNOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ESVIF - NTNOF | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| AKTAF - NTNOF | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.85% | ||
| SOC - NTNOF | 7% Poorly correlated | -11.48% | ||
| PHXHF - NTNOF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| NE - NTNOF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.83% | ||
More | ||||