Advertisement
ESTC vs ZM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESTC is a StrongBuy and ZM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESTC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ESTC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESTC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ESTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ESTC (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.67% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESTC is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2025.
ZM is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.06% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ESTC | ZM | ESTC / ZM | |
| Capitalization | 9.05B | 25.1B | 36% |
| EBITDA | 33.2M | 1.11B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | -14.090 | 3.553 | -397% |
| P/E Ratio | 168.80 | 22.10 | 764% |
| Revenue | 1.55B | 4.75B | 33% |
| Total Cash | 1.49B | 7.78B | 19% |
| Total Debt | 594M | 54.3M | 1,094% |
ESTC | ZM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZM's Valuation (71) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ESTC (83). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ESTC (100). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's SMR Rating (57) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESTC (95). This means that ZM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ESTC (52). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ESTC (78). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
| ESTC | ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INFL | 44.10 | 0.06 | +0.14% |
| Horizon Kinetics Inflation Bnfcrs ETF | |||
| DEHP | 30.22 | -0.13 | -0.43% |
| Dimensional Em Mkts High Prof ETF | |||
| SCDV | 24.30 | -0.13 | -0.54% |
| Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF | |||
| XCLR | 29.65 | -0.19 | -0.62% |
| Global X S&P 500® Collar 95-110 ETF | |||
| QARP | 56.45 | -0.40 | -0.71% |
| Xtrackers Russell 1000 US QARP ETF | |||
ESTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESTC has been closely correlated with DDOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESTC jumps, then DDOG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESTC | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| DDOG - ESTC | 66% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| DT - ESTC | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| HUBS - ESTC | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| TEAM - ESTC | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| NOW - ESTC | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
More | ||||
ZM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.