ESS
Price
$259.78
Change
-$0.95 (-0.36%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.73B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMH
Price
$15.02
Change
+$0.11 (+0.74%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.27B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESS vs UMH

Header iconESS vs UMH Comparison
Open Charts ESS vs UMHBanner chart's image
Essex Property Trust
Price$259.78
Change-$0.95 (-0.36%)
Volume$459.69K
Capitalization16.73B
UMH Properties
Price$15.02
Change+$0.11 (+0.74%)
Volume$3.46K
Capitalization1.27B
ESS vs UMH Comparison Chart in %
ESS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESS vs. UMH commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESS is a StrongBuy and UMH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ESS: $260.83 vs. UMH: $14.91)
Brand notoriety: ESS and UMH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESS: 34% vs. UMH: 38%
Market capitalization -- ESS: $16.73B vs. UMH: $1.28B
ESS [@Media Conglomerates] is valued at $16.73B. UMH’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $25.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUMH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ESS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UMH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMH is a better buy in the long-term than ESS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UMH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESS is a better buy in the short-term than UMH.

Price Growth

ESS (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -0.13% price change this week, while UMH (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -1.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

UMH is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Media Conglomerates (-0.24% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESS($16.7B) has a higher market cap than UMH($1.27B). UMH has higher P/E ratio than ESS: UMH (186.50) vs ESS (19.76). ESS YTD gains are higher at: -5.291 vs. UMH (-17.859). ESS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.72B vs. UMH (119M). UMH has less debt than ESS: UMH (659M) vs ESS (6.81B). ESS has higher revenues than UMH: ESS (1.84B) vs UMH (250M).
ESSUMHESS / UMH
Capitalization16.7B1.27B1,313%
EBITDA1.72B119M1,444%
Gain YTD-5.291-17.85930%
P/E Ratio19.76186.5011%
Revenue1.84B250M736%
Total CashN/A109M-
Total Debt6.81B659M1,034%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESS vs UMH: Fundamental Ratings
ESS
UMH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6272
SMR RATING
1..100
5588
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9019
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UMH's Valuation (24) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESS (83). This means that UMH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESS’s over the last 12 months.

ESS's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (72). This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

ESS's SMR Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMH (88). This means that ESS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMH’s over the last 12 months.

ESS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (59). This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

UMH's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESS (90). This means that UMH’s stock grew significantly faster than ESS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESSUMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMOM68.350.17
+0.25%
JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF
PYZ106.220.23
+0.22%
Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF
IBMR25.360.01
+0.06%
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bd ETF
BLUBF6.06N/A
N/A
Blue Ribbon Income Fund
EVAV28.62N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares

ESS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESS has been closely correlated with EQR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESS jumps, then EQR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESS
1D Price
Change %
ESS100%
+0.23%
EQR - ESS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
AVB - ESS
90%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
UDR - ESS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
MAA - ESS
85%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
CPT - ESS
85%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
More

UMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMH has been closely correlated with UDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMH jumps, then UDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMH
1D Price
Change %
UMH100%
-0.07%
UDR - UMH
70%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
NXRT - UMH
69%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
ESS - UMH
69%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
IRT - UMH
68%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
EQR - UMH
68%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
More