Advertisement
ESS vs UMH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESS is a Hold and UMH is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUMH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ESS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UMH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMH’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ESS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UMH’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ESS (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while UMH (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +2.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
UMH is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (+1.00% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| ESS | UMH | ESS / UMH | |
| Capitalization | 16.3B | 1.29B | 1,260% |
| EBITDA | 1.72B | 119M | 1,444% |
| Gain YTD | -7.419 | -16.481 | 45% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.29 | 189.75 | 10% |
| Revenue | 1.84B | 250M | 736% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 109M | - |
| Total Debt | 6.81B | 659M | 1,034% |
ESS | UMH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UMH's Valuation (21) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESS (84). This means that UMH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESS’s over the last 12 months.
ESS's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (72). This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.
ESS's SMR Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMH (88). This means that ESS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMH’s over the last 12 months.
ESS's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (59). This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.
UMH's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESS (91). This means that UMH’s stock grew significantly faster than ESS’s over the last 12 months.
| ESS | UMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 54% | 7 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 47% | 17 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LQAI | 40.24 | 0.13 | +0.33% |
| LG QRAFT AI-Powrd U.S. Lg Cp Cor ETF | |||
| JHCR | 25.61 | 0.06 | +0.23% |
| JHancock Core Bond ETF | |||
| HYXU | 54.78 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Euro High Yld Corp Bd USD HdgETF | |||
| RQI | 12.03 | -0.15 | -1.23% |
| COHEN & STEERS QUALITY Income REALTY FUND | |||
| CAF | 16.39 | -0.28 | -1.68% |
| Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund | |||
ESS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESS has been closely correlated with EQR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESS jumps, then EQR could also see price increases.
UMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMH has been closely correlated with UDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMH jumps, then UDR could also see price increases.