ESRCF
Price
$1.55
Change
+$0.04 (+2.65%)
Updated
Jan 31 closing price
Capitalization
6.99B
FRPH
Price
$24.56
Change
+$0.25 (+1.03%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
469.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESRCF vs FRPH

Header iconESRCF vs FRPH Comparison
Open Charts ESRCF vs FRPHBanner chart's image
ESR Cayman
Price$1.55
Change+$0.04 (+2.65%)
Volume$340
Capitalization6.99B
FRP Holdings
Price$24.56
Change+$0.25 (+1.03%)
Volume$91.02K
Capitalization469.32M
ESRCF vs FRPH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESRCF vs. FRPH commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESRCF is a StrongBuy and FRPH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ESRCF: $1.55 vs. FRPH: $24.56)
Brand notoriety: ESRCF and FRPH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESRCF: 100% vs. FRPH: 196%
Market capitalization -- ESRCF: $6.99B vs. FRPH: $469.32M
ESRCF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $6.99B. FRPH’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $469.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESRCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRPH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESRCF is a better buy in the long-term than FRPH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRPH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FRPH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ESRCF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FRPH (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.47% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESRCF($6.99B) has a higher market cap than FRPH($469M). FRPH has higher P/E ratio than ESRCF: FRPH (87.71) vs ESRCF (36.80). ESRCF YTD gains are higher at: 2.649 vs. FRPH (-19.817).
ESRCFFRPHESRCF / FRPH
Capitalization6.99B469M1,491%
EBITDAN/A20.5M-
Gain YTD2.649-19.817-13%
P/E Ratio36.8087.7142%
RevenueN/A42.3M-
Total CashN/A153M-
Total DebtN/A180M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRPH: Fundamental Ratings
FRPH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESRCFFRPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVONX24.650.33
+1.36%
Invesco Value Opportunities R5
ESCQX11.540.11
+0.96%
Embark Small Cap Equity Retirement
EACPX62.860.28
+0.45%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
THOAX47.320.07
+0.15%
Thornburg Global Opportunities A
VDMRX10.71-0.06
-0.56%
Virtus KAR Developing Markets R6

ESRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESRCF and UOKA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESRCF and UOKA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESRCF
1D Price
Change %
ESRCF100%
N/A
UOKA - ESRCF
27%
Poorly correlated
-13.68%
ALBT - ESRCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
RMR - ESRCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
GBR - ESRCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
FRPH - ESRCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More

FRPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRPH has been loosely correlated with MMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRPH jumps, then MMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRPH
1D Price
Change %
FRPH100%
+1.03%
MMI - FRPH
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
KW - FRPH
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
CWK - FRPH
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
NMRK - FRPH
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
CBRE - FRPH
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
More