ESQ
Price
$78.97
Change
-$2.93 (-3.58%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
393.14M
63 days until earnings call
HFWA
Price
$24.15
Change
-$0.08 (-0.33%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
671.96M
52 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ESQ vs HFWA

Header iconESQ vs HFWA Comparison
Open Charts ESQ vs HFWABanner chart's image
Esquire Financial Holdings
Price$78.97
Change-$2.93 (-3.58%)
Volume$50.97K
Capitalization393.14M
Heritage Financial
Price$24.15
Change-$0.08 (-0.33%)
Volume$332.43K
Capitalization671.96M
ESQ vs HFWA Comparison Chart
Loading...
ESQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESQ vs. HFWA commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESQ is a Hold and HFWA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (ESQ: $78.97 vs. HFWA: $24.15)
Brand notoriety: ESQ and HFWA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESQ: 58% vs. HFWA: 165%
Market capitalization -- ESQ: $393.14M vs. HFWA: $671.96M
ESQ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $393.14M. HFWA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $671.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESQ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHFWA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ESQ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HFWA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESQ is a better buy in the long-term than HFWA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFWA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HFWA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESQ is a better buy in the short-term than HFWA.

Price Growth

ESQ (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.74% price change this week, while HFWA (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESQ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

HFWA is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFWA($672M) has a higher market cap than ESQ($393M). HFWA has higher P/E ratio than ESQ: HFWA (10.83) vs ESQ (9.71). ESQ YTD gains are higher at: -0.463 vs. HFWA (-0.498). HFWA has more cash in the bank: 55.9M vs. ESQ (614K). ESQ has less debt than HFWA: ESQ (49K) vs HFWA (21.8M). HFWA has higher revenues than ESQ: HFWA (244M) vs ESQ (110M).
ESQHFWAESQ / HFWA
Capitalization393M672M58%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.463-0.49893%
P/E Ratio9.7110.8390%
Revenue110M244M45%
Total Cash614K55.9M1%
Total Debt49K21.8M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESQ vs HFWA: Fundamental Ratings
ESQ
HFWA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7571
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
279
SMR RATING
1..100
2421
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1510
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFWA's Valuation (61) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESQ (97) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HFWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESQ’s over the last 12 months.

ESQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HFWA (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew significantly faster than HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's SMR Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ESQ (24) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to ESQ’s over the last 12 months.

ESQ's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ESQ (15) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to ESQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESQHFWA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ESQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

ESQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESQ has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESQ jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESQ
1D Price
Change %
ESQ100%
-3.58%
FFBC - ESQ
70%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
CAC - ESQ
69%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
CHCO - ESQ
69%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
SMBC - ESQ
69%
Closely correlated
-1.73%
HFWA - ESQ
69%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
More

HFWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFWA has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFWA jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFWA
1D Price
Change %
HFWA100%
-0.33%
UBSI - HFWA
91%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
NWBI - HFWA
91%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
BANR - HFWA
89%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
FCF - HFWA
89%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
FFBC - HFWA
89%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
More