ESPR
Price
$2.96
Change
-$0.07 (-2.31%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
701.72M
102 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZOMDF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
92.36M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESPR vs ZOMDF

Header iconESPR vs ZOMDF Comparison
Open Charts ESPR vs ZOMDFBanner chart's image
Esperion Therapeutics
Price$2.96
Change-$0.07 (-2.31%)
Volume$6.13M
Capitalization701.72M
Zomedica
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$2.93M
Capitalization92.36M
ESPR vs ZOMDF Comparison Chart in %
ESPR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZOMDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESPR vs. ZOMDF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPR is a StrongBuy and ZOMDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ESPR: $2.96 vs. ZOMDF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: ESPR and ZOMDF are both not notable
ESPR represents the Pharmaceuticals: Generic, while ZOMDF is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESPR: 85% vs. ZOMDF: 144%
Market capitalization -- ESPR: $701.72M vs. ZOMDF: $92.36M
ESPR [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $701.72M. ZOMDF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $92.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $224.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $4.17B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESPR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZOMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ESPR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZOMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ESPR and ZOMDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESPR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZOMDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESPR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ZOMDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESPR is a better buy in the short-term than ZOMDF.

Price Growth

ESPR (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +18.40% price change this week, while ZOMDF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +12.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.64%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESPR is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+0.58% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

@Medical/Nursing Services (+0.36% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESPR($702M) has a higher market cap than ZOMDF($92.4M). ESPR YTD gains are higher at: 37.727 vs. ZOMDF (-19.650). ESPR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -32.5M vs. ZOMDF (-36.65M). ESPR has more cash in the bank: 86.1M vs. ZOMDF (58.1M). ZOMDF has less debt than ESPR: ZOMDF (2.52M) vs ESPR (302M). ESPR has higher revenues than ZOMDF: ESPR (268M) vs ZOMDF (28.4M).
ESPRZOMDFESPR / ZOMDF
Capitalization702M92.4M760%
EBITDA-32.5M-36.65M89%
Gain YTD37.727-19.650-192%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue268M28.4M944%
Total Cash86.1M58.1M148%
Total Debt302M2.52M11,994%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESPR vs ZOMDF: Fundamental Ratings
ESPR
ZOMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6615
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZOMDF's Valuation (34) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as ESPR (38) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ZOMDF’s stock grew similarly to ESPR’s over the last 12 months.

ZOMDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as ESPR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ZOMDF’s stock grew similarly to ESPR’s over the last 12 months.

ZOMDF's SMR Rating (97) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as ESPR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ZOMDF’s stock grew similarly to ESPR’s over the last 12 months.

ESPR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ZOMDF (36) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that ESPR’s stock grew similarly to ZOMDF’s over the last 12 months.

ESPR's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ZOMDF (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that ESPR’s stock grew similarly to ZOMDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESPRZOMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESPR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZOMDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTSSX42.830.06
+0.14%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed US Mid&Sm Cap S
MGEMX28.13N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts I
FDSVX70.77N/A
N/A
Fidelity Growth Discovery
MAECX13.74-0.01
-0.07%
BlackRock Emerging Markets Ex-Chn Inst
VTAIX11.19-0.02
-0.18%
Virtus Tactical Allocation I

ESPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESPR and AQST have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESPR and AQST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESPR
1D Price
Change %
ESPR100%
-2.26%
AQST - ESPR
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
ANIP - ESPR
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
DVAX - ESPR
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
ZOMDF - ESPR
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
ALKS - ESPR
26%
Poorly correlated
-7.11%
More

ZOMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZOMDF has been loosely correlated with SNDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZOMDF jumps, then SNDL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZOMDF
1D Price
Change %
ZOMDF100%
+2.36%
SNDL - ZOMDF
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.24%
CDNA - ZOMDF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
EBS - ZOMDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
ARAY - ZOMDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
BNR - ZOMDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
More