ESPR
Price
$4.08
Change
+$0.25 (+6.53%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
967.24M
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EVO
Price
$3.07
Change
+$0.07 (+2.33%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
110 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESPR vs EVO

Header iconESPR vs EVO Comparison
Open Charts ESPR vs EVOBanner chart's image
Esperion Therapeutics
Price$4.08
Change+$0.25 (+6.53%)
Volume$11.44M
Capitalization967.24M
Evotec SE
Price$3.07
Change+$0.07 (+2.33%)
Volume$151.56K
Capitalization1.09B
ESPR vs EVO Comparison Chart in %
ESPR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EVO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESPR vs. EVO commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPR is a StrongBuy and EVO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (ESPR: $4.08 vs. EVO: $3.07)
Brand notoriety: ESPR and EVO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESPR: 165% vs. EVO: 192%
Market capitalization -- ESPR: $967.24M vs. EVO: $1.09B
ESPR [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $967.24M. EVO’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $1.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $4.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESPR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEVO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESPR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EVO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESPR is a better buy in the long-term than EVO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESPR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EVO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESPR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EVO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESPR is a better buy in the short-term than EVO.

Price Growth

ESPR (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +7.65% price change this week, while EVO (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -4.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESPR is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

EVO is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+0.50% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EVO($1.09B) has a higher market cap than ESPR($967M). ESPR YTD gains are higher at: 85.455 vs. EVO (-26.202). ESPR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -32.5M vs. EVO (-121.33M). EVO has more cash in the bank: 356M vs. ESPR (86.1M). EVO has less debt than ESPR: EVO (107M) vs ESPR (302M). EVO has higher revenues than ESPR: EVO (777M) vs ESPR (268M).
ESPREVOESPR / EVO
Capitalization967M1.09B89%
EBITDA-32.5M-121.33M27%
Gain YTD85.455-26.202-326%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue268M777M34%
Total Cash86.1M356M24%
Total Debt302M107M282%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESPR vs EVO: Fundamental Ratings
ESPR
EVO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2977
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ESPR's Valuation (39) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EVO (92) in the null industry. This means that ESPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than EVO’s over the last 12 months.

ESPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as EVO (100) in the null industry. This means that ESPR’s stock grew similarly to EVO’s over the last 12 months.

EVO's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ESPR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that EVO’s stock grew similarly to ESPR’s over the last 12 months.

ESPR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as EVO (64) in the null industry. This means that ESPR’s stock grew similarly to EVO’s over the last 12 months.

EVO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESPR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that EVO’s stock grew significantly faster than ESPR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESPREVO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESPR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EVO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRMCX26.890.18
+0.67%
Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val A
DLHAX25.960.17
+0.66%
Nomura Healthcare Fund Class A
RYCUX46.240.28
+0.61%
Rydex Utilities C
CSJRX66.120.25
+0.38%
Cohen & Steers Realty Shares R
BCSFX24.79N/A
N/A
Brown Capital Mgmt Intl Sm Co Instl

ESPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESPR and AQST have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESPR and AQST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESPR
1D Price
Change %
ESPR100%
+6.53%
AQST - ESPR
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
ANIP - ESPR
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
HROW - ESPR
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
VTRS - ESPR
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
ZOMDF - ESPR
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
More

EVO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVO has been loosely correlated with SNDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EVO jumps, then SNDL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EVO
1D Price
Change %
EVO100%
+2.33%
SNDL - EVO
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.12%
PRGO - EVO
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
ACET - EVO
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.81%
ELAN - EVO
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
OGI - EVO
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
More