Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESPO vs SMH
ESPO vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts ESPO vs SMH
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
Price$97.98
Change-$20.70 (-17.44%)
Volume$55.01K
Net Assets319.33M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$397.68
Change+$52.47 (+15.20%)
Volume$12.19M
Net Assets44.68B
ESPO vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESPO vs. SMH commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPO is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 44.7B vs. ESPO (319M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than ESPO: SMH (13.284) vs ESPO (-2.772). ESPO was incepted earlier than SMH: ESPO (7 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than ESPO (0.56). ESPO has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| ESPO | SMH | ESPO / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -2.772 | 13.284 | -21% |
| Net Assets | 319M | 44.7B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.35 | 160% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 12.00 | 442% |
| Yield | 1.27 | 0.27 | 464% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESPO | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TOPC | 31.85 | 0.27 | +0.85% |
| iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF | |||
| OMFL | 63.18 | 0.38 | +0.61% |
| Invesco Russell 1000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF | |||
| ABCS | 31.13 | 0.15 | +0.49% |
| Alpha Blue Capital US Sm-Md Cp Dyn ETF | |||
| LRND | 40.76 | -0.19 | -0.47% |
| NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF | |||
| BTCO | 77.68 | -5.76 | -6.90% |
| Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF | |||
ESPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPO | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| NVDA - ESPO | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| APP - ESPO | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| U - ESPO | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| RBLX - ESPO | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| AMD - ESPO | 51% Loosely correlated | +4.03% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
More | ||||