Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESPO vs FDCF
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts ESPO vs FDCF
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
Price$106.08
Change+$0.50 (+0.47%)
Volume$200
Net Assets348.19M
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$48.57
Change+$0.33 (+0.68%)
Volume$125
Net Assets106.35M
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESPO vs. FDCF commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPO is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESPO has more net assets: 348M vs. FDCF (106M). ESPO has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: ESPO (1.906) vs FDCF (0.339). ESPO was incepted earlier than FDCF: ESPO (7 years) vs FDCF (6 years). FDCF (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ESPO (0.56). ESPO has a higher turnover FDCF (23.00) vs FDCF (23.00).
| ESPO | FDCF | ESPO / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 1.906 | 0.339 | 562% |
| Net Assets | 348M | 106M | 328% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 23.00 | 157% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 0.03 | 3,732% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESPO | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSQRX | 30.56 | 0.23 | +0.76% |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R | |||
| ALVDX | 10.67 | 0.07 | +0.66% |
| American Century Focused Lg Cap Val R6 | |||
| ARIDX | 5.10 | 0.03 | +0.59% |
| AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value I | |||
| PPAJX | 22.38 | 0.13 | +0.58% |
| GMO U.S. Opportunistic Value R6 | |||
| AGWUX | 59.18 | -0.87 | -1.45% |
| American Century Growth R5 | |||
ESPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPO | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| NVDA - ESPO | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| APP - ESPO | 58% Loosely correlated | -7.61% | ||
| U - ESPO | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.95% | ||
| RBLX - ESPO | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| AMD - ESPO | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| META - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
More | ||||