Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESPO vs FDCF
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts ESPO vs FDCF
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
Price$115.06
Change+$0.78 (+0.68%)
Volume$20.74K
Net Assets444.55M
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$48.07
Change+$0.22 (+0.46%)
Volume$42.57K
Net Assets91.57M
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESPO vs. FDCF commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPO is a StrongBuy and FDCF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESPO has more net assets: 445M vs. FDCF (91.6M). ESPO has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: ESPO (37.995) vs FDCF (27.309). ESPO was incepted earlier than FDCF: ESPO (7 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FDCF (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ESPO (0.56). ESPO has a higher turnover FDCF (23.00) vs FDCF (23.00).
| ESPO | FDCF | ESPO / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 37.995 | 27.309 | 139% |
| Net Assets | 445M | 91.6M | 486% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 23.00 | 157% |
| Yield | 0.32 | 0.03 | 941% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESPO | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ESPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with APP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then APP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPO | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| APP - ESPO | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| AMD - ESPO | 59% Loosely correlated | -6.58% | ||
| U - ESPO | 54% Loosely correlated | +9.06% | ||
| SE - ESPO | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| RBLX - ESPO | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| META - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 71% Closely correlated | +3.49% | ||
More | ||||