Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESPO vs FDCF
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts ESPO vs FDCF
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
Price$106.16
Change-$0.39 (-0.37%)
Volume$31.44K
Net Assets381.62M
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$44.35
Change+$0.30 (+0.68%)
Volume$9.76K
Net Assets75.58M
ESPO vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESPO vs. FDCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESPO is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESPO has more net assets: 382M vs. FDCF (75.6M). ESPO has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: ESPO (27.321) vs FDCF (17.462). ESPO was incepted earlier than FDCF: ESPO (7 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FDCF (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ESPO (0.56). FDCF has a higher turnover ESPO (30.00) vs ESPO (30.00).
| ESPO | FDCF | ESPO / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 27.321 | 17.462 | 156% |
| Net Assets | 382M | 75.6M | 505% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 35.00 | 86% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 0.04 | 926% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESPO | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 25 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ESPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with APP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then APP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPO | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| APP - ESPO | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| AMD - ESPO | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| U - ESPO | 56% Loosely correlated | +7.62% | ||
| RBLX - ESPO | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| GME - ESPO | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 77% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | +4.90% | ||
More | ||||