ESOA vs JGCCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESOA is a Hold and JGCCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESOA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJGCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ESOA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- JGCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESOA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ESOA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ESOA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +14.20% price change this week, while JGCCF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -0.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESOA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+0.60% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| ESOA | JGCCF | ESOA / JGCCF | |
| Capitalization | 233M | 1.96B | 12% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 135.284 | -27.288 | -496% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.70 | 18.81 | 52% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 48.5M | N/A | - |
ESOA | JGCCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JGCCF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ESOA (54). This means that JGCCF’s stock grew similarly to ESOA’s over the last 12 months.
ESOA's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JGCCF (100). This means that ESOA’s stock grew significantly faster than JGCCF’s over the last 12 months.
ESOA's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as JGCCF (72). This means that ESOA’s stock grew similarly to JGCCF’s over the last 12 months.
ESOA's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JGCCF (74). This means that ESOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than JGCCF’s over the last 12 months.
JGCCF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESOA (96). This means that JGCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than ESOA’s over the last 12 months.
| ESOA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
ESOA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESOA has been loosely correlated with CTNGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESOA jumps, then CTNGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESOA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESOA | 100% | -2.36% | ||
| CTNGY - ESOA | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GLDD - ESOA | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| BLNK - ESOA | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.73% | ||
| MTRX - ESOA | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.36% | ||
| BWMN - ESOA | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
More | ||||
JGCCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JGCCF and JGCCY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JGCCF and JGCCY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JGCCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JGCCF | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| JGCCY - JGCCF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EFGSY - JGCCF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
| ESOA - JGCCF | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.36% | ||
| KAJMF - JGCCF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HOCFF - JGCCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||