| ESML | SCHA | ESML / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 12.827 | 13.790 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 19.7B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.04 | 425% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 11.00 | 318% |
| Yield | 1.18 | 1.38 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| ESML | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPUC | 47.34 | 0.14 | +0.30% |
| Simplify US Equity PLUS Upsd Cnvxty ETF | |||
| QFLR | 34.56 | 0.06 | +0.17% |
| Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | |||
| PFFL | 8.27 | N/A | +0.02% |
| ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Lvrgd Pref Stk ETN | |||
| RMCA | 24.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Rockefeller California Municipal Bd ETF | |||
| BITB | 47.40 | -0.21 | -0.44% |
| Bitwise Bitcoin ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESML has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESML jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESML | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| JHG - ESML | 72% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| FRT - ESML | 69% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| AYI - ESML | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| USFD - ESML | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| EME - ESML | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||