ESLT
Price
$582.16
Change
+$2.06 (+0.36%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
27.1B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOC
Price
$582.35
Change
+$2.29 (+0.39%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
83.11B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESLT vs NOC

Header iconESLT vs NOC Comparison
Open Charts ESLT vs NOCBanner chart's image
Elbit Systems
Price$582.16
Change+$2.06 (+0.36%)
Volume$46.1K
Capitalization27.1B
Northrop Grumman
Price$582.35
Change+$2.29 (+0.39%)
Volume$202.61K
Capitalization83.11B
ESLT vs NOC Comparison Chart in %
ESLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESLT vs. NOC commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESLT is a Buy and NOC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ESLT: $582.16 vs. NOC: $582.35)
Brand notoriety: ESLT: Not notable vs. NOC: Notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESLT: 46% vs. NOC: 27%
Market capitalization -- ESLT: $27.1B vs. NOC: $83.11B
ESLT [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $27.1B. NOC’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $83.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $334.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $23.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESLT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ESLT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NOC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOC is a better buy in the long-term than ESLT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESLT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESLT is a better buy in the short-term than NOC.

Price Growth

ESLT (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +8.01% price change this week, while NOC (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +3.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +8.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESLT is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2026.

NOC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+8.13% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOC($83.1B) has a higher market cap than ESLT($27.1B). ESLT has higher P/E ratio than NOC: ESLT (59.10) vs NOC (20.97). ESLT YTD gains are higher at: 126.571 vs. NOC (25.737). NOC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.01B vs. ESLT (770M). NOC has more cash in the bank: 1.96B vs. ESLT (736M). ESLT has less debt than NOC: ESLT (1.07B) vs NOC (17B). NOC has higher revenues than ESLT: NOC (40.9B) vs ESLT (7.72B).
ESLTNOCESLT / NOC
Capitalization27.1B83.1B33%
EBITDA770M7.01B11%
Gain YTD126.57125.737492%
P/E Ratio59.1020.97282%
Revenue7.72B40.9B19%
Total Cash736M1.96B38%
Total Debt1.07B17B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESLT vs NOC: Fundamental Ratings
ESLT
NOC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2914
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
214
SMR RATING
1..100
6036
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2082
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOC's Valuation (20) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESLT (89). This means that NOC’s stock grew significantly faster than ESLT’s over the last 12 months.

ESLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as NOC (14). This means that ESLT’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

NOC's SMR Rating (36) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as ESLT (60). This means that NOC’s stock grew similarly to ESLT’s over the last 12 months.

ESLT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as NOC (49). This means that ESLT’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

ESLT's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOC (82). This means that ESLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESLTNOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
44%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAMV32.730.19
+0.60%
Brookstone Value Stock ETF
JPC8.090.04
+0.50%
Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities Fund
AVSD74.690.13
+0.18%
Avantis Responsible International Eq ETF
TJUN21.69N/A
N/A
FT Vest Emerging Mkts Buffer ETF - June
BETH50.87-3.12
-5.78%
ProShares Bitcoin&EtherMktCapWtdETF

ESLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESLT has been loosely correlated with DRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESLT jumps, then DRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESLT
1D Price
Change %
ESLT100%
+0.36%
DRS - ESLT
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
LHX - ESLT
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
HEI - ESLT
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
LMT - ESLT
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
NOC - ESLT
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
More

NOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been loosely correlated with RTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then RTX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOC
1D Price
Change %
NOC100%
+0.39%
RTX - NOC
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
LHX - NOC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
GD - NOC
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
HII - NOC
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
LMT - NOC
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
More