Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESIX vs SCHA
ESIX vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts ESIX vs SCHA
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF
Price$28.99
Change-$0.33 (-1.13%)
Volume$252
Net Assets7.37M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$25.27
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Volume$4.59M
Net Assets17.27B
ESIX vs SCHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESIX vs. SCHA commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESIX is a Hold and SCHA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 17.3B vs. ESIX (7.37M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than ESIX: SCHA (-1.735) vs ESIX (-6.822). ESIX was incepted earlier than SCHA: ESIX (3 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than ESIX (0.12). ESIX has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| ESIX | SCHA | ESIX / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | -6.822 | -1.735 | 393% |
| Net Assets | 7.37M | 17.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 0.04 | 300% |
| Turnover | 47.00 | 11.00 | 427% |
| Yield | 1.89 | 1.62 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ESIX | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ESIX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESIX has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESIX jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESIX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESIX | 100% | N/A | ||
| ABCB - ESIX | 83% Closely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| WSFS - ESIX | 80% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| FFBC - ESIX | 79% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| SBCF - ESIX | 78% Closely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| KMT - ESIX | 78% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||