Advertisement
ESIX vs SBCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESIX is a Hold and SBCF is a Hold.
SBCF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ESIX | SBCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 27 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FANIX | 47.43 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Energy I | |||
| PADEX | 22.57 | -0.05 | -0.22% |
| Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R5 | |||
| HSUCX | 32.98 | -0.08 | -0.24% |
| Rational Dynamic Brands C | |||
| MINGX | 42.98 | -0.18 | -0.42% |
| MFS International Intrinsic Value R3 | |||
| MYISX | 21.54 | -0.11 | -0.51% |
| Victory Integrity Small/Mid-Cap Value Y | |||
ESIX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESIX has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESIX jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESIX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESIX | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| ABCB - ESIX | 83% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| WSFS - ESIX | 80% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| FFBC - ESIX | 79% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| SBCF - ESIX | 78% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| KMT - ESIX | 78% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||
SBCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SBCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBCF | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| TRMK - SBCF | 90% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| UCB - SBCF | 90% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| UBSI - SBCF | 90% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| EFSC - SBCF | 90% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| WSFS - SBCF | 90% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||