Advertisement
ESHA vs RMHI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESHA is a Buy and RMHI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESHA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMHI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ESHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RMHI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESHA’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMHI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ESHA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
- RMHI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ESHA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while RMHI (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -43.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.42%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.77%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+2.41% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Services to the Health Industry (-0.83% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| ESHA | RMHI | ESHA / RMHI | |
| Capitalization | 47.6M | 41.1M | 116% |
| EBITDA | -2.6M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.278 | 49.533 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | 79.86 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 136K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
RMHI | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ESHA | RMHI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 19% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 6% | 18 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 6% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 5% | 2 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
ESHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESHA has been loosely correlated with ASPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESHA jumps, then ASPC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESHA | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| ASPC - ESHA | 42% Loosely correlated | +78.91% | ||
| ASPCU - ESHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +58.51% | ||
| YHNA - ESHA | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FACT - ESHA | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LPAAU - ESHA | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RMHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RMHI and MTLK have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMHI and MTLK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMHI | 100% | -22.71% | ||
| MTLK - RMHI | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RENI - RMHI | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ESHA - RMHI | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| OAKU - RMHI | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
| ALCYU - RMHI | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||