ESHA
Price
$11.49
Change
-$0.04 (-0.35%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
44.84M
FGMC
Price
$10.00
Change
+$0.02 (+0.20%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
102.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESHA vs FGMC

Header iconESHA vs FGMC Comparison
Open Charts ESHA vs FGMCBanner chart's image
ESH Acquisition
Price$11.49
Change-$0.04 (-0.35%)
Volume$293
Capitalization44.84M
FG Merger II
Price$10.00
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
Volume$27.51K
Capitalization102.94M
ESHA vs FGMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESHA vs. FGMC commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESHA is a Buy and FGMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ESHA: $11.49 vs. FGMC: $10.00)
Brand notoriety: ESHA and FGMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESHA: 8% vs. FGMC: 37%
Market capitalization -- ESHA: $44.84M vs. FGMC: $102.94M
ESHA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $44.84M. FGMC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $102.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $174.23M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESHA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFGMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ESHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FGMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESHA is a better buy in the long-term than FGMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESHA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGMC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FGMC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESHA is a better buy in the short-term than FGMC.

Price Growth

ESHA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -1.54% price change this week, while FGMC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.64% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGMC($103M) has a higher market cap than ESHA($44.8M). FGMC has higher P/E ratio than ESHA: FGMC (117.82) vs ESHA (79.86). FGMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -234.06K vs. ESHA (-1.93M). ESHA (518K) and FGMC (518K) have equal amount of cash in the bank . ESHA (0) and FGMC (0) have equivalent revenues.
ESHAFGMCESHA / FGMC
Capitalization44.8M103M43%
EBITDA-1.93M-234.06K824%
Gain YTD6.685N/A-
P/E Ratio79.86117.8268%
Revenue00-
Total Cash518K518K100%
Total DebtN/A286K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESHAFGMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
7%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
21%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMTI1.270.05
+4.10%
Rockwell Medical
AXP341.681.50
+0.44%
American Express Company
NMM47.760.10
+0.21%
Navios Maritime Partners LP
IBP249.180.48
+0.19%
Installed Building Products
ARQ7.16-0.24
-3.24%
Arq

ESHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESHA and ASPC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESHA and ASPC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESHA
1D Price
Change %
ESHA100%
-0.35%
ASPC - ESHA
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIMAU - ESHA
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LPAAU - ESHA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSUF - ESHA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LPAA - ESHA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FGMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGMC has been loosely correlated with NETDU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGMC jumps, then NETDU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGMC
1D Price
Change %
FGMC100%
+0.14%
NETDU - FGMC
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ASPC - FGMC
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SIMAU - FGMC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESHA - FGMC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
AFJKU - FGMC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More