Advertisement
ESGRF vs PFFV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGRF is a StrongBuy and PFFV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESGRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- ESGRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESGRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ESGRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ESGRF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +1.27% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Multi-Line Insurance (-1.72% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
ESGRF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ESGRF | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 28% | 4 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 28% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 23% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 30% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 38% | 11 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 36% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
ESGRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESGRF has been closely correlated with ESGOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESGRF jumps, then ESGOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESGRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESGRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ESGOF - ESGRF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| ACGLO - ESGRF | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| ACGLN - ESGRF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| FIHL - ESGRF | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
| SLF - ESGRF | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||
PFFV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFFV has been loosely correlated with HBANL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PFFV jumps, then HBANL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFFV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFFV | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| HBANL - PFFV | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| FITBI - PFFV | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| CHSCN - PFFV | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| ESGRF - PFFV | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SLMBP - PFFV | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
More | ||||