ESGRF
Price
$20.70
Change
+$0.70 (+3.50%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
218.88K
FIHL
Price
$15.84
Change
-$0.14 (-0.88%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.26B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESGRF vs FIHL

Header iconESGRF vs FIHL Comparison
Open Charts ESGRF vs FIHLBanner chart's image
Enstar Group
Price$20.70
Change+$0.70 (+3.50%)
Volume$595.6K
Capitalization218.88K
Fidelis Insurance Holdings
Price$15.84
Change-$0.14 (-0.88%)
Volume$4.8K
Capitalization2.26B
ESGRF vs FIHL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESGRF vs. FIHL commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGRF is a Hold and FIHL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (ESGRF: $20.70 vs. FIHL: $15.98)
Brand notoriety: ESGRF and FIHL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESGRF: 417% vs. FIHL: 64%
Market capitalization -- ESGRF: $218.88K vs. FIHL: $2.26B
ESGRF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $218.88K. FIHL’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $2.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESGRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFIHL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ESGRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FIHL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESGRF is a better buy in the long-term than FIHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESGRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIHL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESGRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FIHL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESGRF is a better buy in the short-term than FIHL.

Price Growth

ESGRF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +1.07% price change this week, while FIHL (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +1.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

FIHL is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.89% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIHL($2.26B) has a higher market cap than ESGRF($219K). ESGRF YTD gains are higher at: 1.720 vs. FIHL (-10.700). ESGRF has more cash in the bank: 5.89B vs. FIHL (4.01B). FIHL has less debt than ESGRF: FIHL (448M) vs ESGRF (1.83B). FIHL has higher revenues than ESGRF: FIHL (3.59B) vs ESGRF (1.15B).
ESGRFFIHLESGRF / FIHL
Capitalization219K2.26B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.720-10.700-16%
P/E RatioN/A1.03-
Revenue1.15B3.59B32%
Total Cash5.89B4.01B147%
Total Debt1.83B448M409%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESGRF: Fundamental Ratings
ESGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESGRFFIHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTC199.612.61
+1.32%
PTC
IOSP83.02-1.99
-2.34%
Innospec
SMP31.42-0.92
-2.84%
Standard Motor Products
IMRX4.13-0.17
-3.95%
Immuneering Corp
FGI0.92-0.06
-6.13%
FGI Industries Ltd

ESGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESGRF has been closely correlated with ESGOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESGRF jumps, then ESGOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESGRF
1D Price
Change %
ESGRF100%
+3.50%
ESGOF - ESGRF
77%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
ACGLO - ESGRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
ACGLN - ESGRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
FIHL - ESGRF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
SLF - ESGRF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More

FIHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIHL has been loosely correlated with ACGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIHL jumps, then ACGL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIHL
1D Price
Change %
FIHL100%
+0.57%
ACGL - FIHL
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ORI - FIHL
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
AIG - FIHL
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
AEG - FIHL
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SLF - FIHL
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
More