ESGR
Price
$336.39
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.72B
30 days until earnings call
FGF
Price
$16.01
Change
-$0.70 (-4.19%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
40M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESGR vs FGF

Header iconESGR vs FGF Comparison
Open Charts ESGR vs FGFBanner chart's image
Enstar Group
Price$336.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20
Capitalization4.72B
Fundamental Global
Price$16.01
Change-$0.70 (-4.19%)
Volume$33.58K
Capitalization40M
ESGR vs FGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESGR vs. FGF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGR is a Buy and FGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ESGR: $336.39 vs. FGF: $16.01)
Brand notoriety: ESGR and FGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESGR: 0% vs. FGF: 1284%
Market capitalization -- ESGR: $4.72B vs. FGF: $40M
ESGR [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $4.72B. FGF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $40M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESGR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ESGR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESGR is a better buy in the long-term than FGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESGR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESGR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESGR is a better buy in the short-term than FGF.

Price Growth

ESGR (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.03% price change this week, while FGF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -9.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESGR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.79% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESGR($4.72B) has a higher market cap than FGF($40M). FGF has higher P/E ratio than ESGR: FGF (6.71) vs ESGR (4.48). ESGR YTD gains are higher at: 4.453 vs. FGF (-26.560). ESGR has more cash in the bank: 5.89B vs. FGF (2.4M). FGF has less debt than ESGR: FGF (387K) vs ESGR (1.83B). ESGR has higher revenues than FGF: ESGR (1.15B) vs FGF (23.7M).
ESGRFGFESGR / FGF
Capitalization4.72B40M11,808%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.453-26.560-17%
P/E Ratio4.486.7167%
Revenue1.15B23.7M4,865%
Total Cash5.89B2.4M245,785%
Total Debt1.83B387K473,127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESGR vs FGF: Fundamental Ratings
ESGR
FGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24100
SMR RATING
1..100
9394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5481
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGF's Valuation (84) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ESGR (86) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that FGF’s stock grew similarly to ESGR’s over the last 12 months.

ESGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGF (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that ESGR’s stock grew significantly faster than FGF’s over the last 12 months.

ESGR's SMR Rating (93) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as FGF (94) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that ESGR’s stock grew similarly to FGF’s over the last 12 months.

ESGR's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as FGF (81) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that ESGR’s stock grew similarly to FGF’s over the last 12 months.

ESGR's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGF (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that ESGR’s stock grew significantly faster than FGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESGRFGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
49%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BXSL31.34-0.17
-0.54%
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
CDRE32.03-0.24
-0.74%
Cadre Holdings
MU124.76-1.24
-0.98%
Micron Technology
EDAP1.67-0.05
-2.62%
EDAP TMS SA
NCSM29.74-1.31
-4.22%
NCS Multistage Holdings

ESGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESGR has been loosely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESGR jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESGR
1D Price
Change %
ESGR100%
N/A
SLF - ESGR
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
ESGRO - ESGR
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
AIG - ESGR
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
ESGRP - ESGR
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
AEG - ESGR
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
More

FGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGF and FIHL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGF and FIHL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGF
1D Price
Change %
FGF100%
-6.37%
FIHL - FGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
ESGR - FGF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGIC - FGF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
ORI - FGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
SLF - FGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More