Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGNX vs NPFCX
ESGNX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGNX vs NPFCX
Mirova Global Megatrends N
Price$22.52
Change-$0.34 (-1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets845.83M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.59
Change-$1.15 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
ESGNX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGNX vs. NPFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGNX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. ESGNX (846M). ESGNX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: ESGNX (0.36) vs NPFCX (0.00). ESGNX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGNX (9 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ESGNX (0.89). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGNX (18.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGNX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGNX (1000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. ESGNX (8.53). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.64 vs. ESGNX (25.23).
| ESGNX | NPFCX | ESGNX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.48 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.48 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.845 | 20.449 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 846M | 165B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 13.49 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.73 | 47.67 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.23 | 28.64 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement