Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGMX vs NPFFX
ESGMX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts ESGMX vs NPFFX
Mirova Global Megatrends A
Price$21.40
Change+$0.13 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets886.23M
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$72.41
Change+$0.38 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.61B
ESGMX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGMX vs. NPFFX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGMX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. ESGMX (886M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than ESGMX: NPFFX (0.45) vs ESGMX (0.11). ESGMX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: ESGMX (10 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). ESGMX (1.24) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGMX (18.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: NPFFX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. ESGMX (-0.95). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.55 vs. ESGMX (26.73).
| ESGMX | NPFFX | ESGMX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.78 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.78 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.592 | 17.549 | 43% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 886M | 161B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.45 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.95 | 10.76 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.36 | 61.53 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.73 | 40.55 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement