Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGMX vs NPFCX
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGMX vs NPFCX
Mirova Global Megatrends A
Price$22.11
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets858.76M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.04
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGMX vs. NPFCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGMX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ESGMX (859M). ESGMX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: ESGMX (0.11) vs NPFCX (0.00). ESGMX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGMX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ESGMX (1.24). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGMX (18.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.50 vs. ESGMX (9.13). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.95 vs. ESGMX (15.51).
| ESGMX | NPFCX | ESGMX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.48 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.48 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.161 | 14.059 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859M | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | 11.50 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.91 | 49.30 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.51 | 16.95 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement