Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGMX vs NPFCX
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGMX vs NPFCX
Mirova Global Megatrends A
Price$22.25
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets859.16M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$67.15
Change+$0.09 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGMX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jan 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGMX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ESGMX (859M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than ESGMX: NPFCX (0.35) vs ESGMX (0.14). ESGMX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGMX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ESGMX (1.24). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGMX (18.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.80 vs. ESGMX (10.63). NPFCX (15.27) and ESGMX (14.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ESGMX | NPFCX | ESGMX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.48 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.48 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.738 | 2.503 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859M | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.35 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.63 | 14.80 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.92 | 42.93 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.91 | 15.27 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers