Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGMX vs NPFCX
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGMX vs NPFCX
Mirova Global Megatrends A
Price$22.17
Change+$0.17 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets889.36M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.54
Change+$0.12 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGMX vs. NPFCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGMX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ESGMX (889M). ESGMX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: ESGMX (0.11) vs NPFCX (0.00). ESGMX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGMX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ESGMX (1.24). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGMX (18.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.61 vs. ESGMX (2.86). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.75 vs. ESGMX (24.13).
| ESGMX | NPFCX | ESGMX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.48 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.48 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.463 | 18.377 | 62% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 889M | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.86 | 11.61 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.13 | 58.05 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.13 | 29.75 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement