ESGLF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
25.07M
HWAUF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
15.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESGLF vs HWAUF

Header iconESGLF vs HWAUF Comparison
Open Charts ESGLF vs HWAUFBanner chart's image
EnviroGold Global
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization25.07M
Headwater Gold
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$54.5K
Capitalization15.96M
ESGLF vs HWAUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESGLF vs. HWAUF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGLF is a Hold and HWAUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ESGLF: $0.07 vs. HWAUF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: ESGLF and HWAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESGLF: 40% vs. HWAUF: 114%
Market capitalization -- ESGLF: $25.07M vs. HWAUF: $15.96M
ESGLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $25.07M. HWAUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESGLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHWAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ESGLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HWAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ESGLF and HWAUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESGLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWAUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESGLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HWAUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESGLF is a better buy in the short-term than HWAUF.

Price Growth

ESGLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.60% price change this week, while HWAUF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESGLF($25.1M) has a higher market cap than HWAUF($16M). ESGLF YTD gains are higher at: 100.145 vs. HWAUF (32.667). HWAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -910.53K vs. ESGLF (-4.72M). HWAUF has more cash in the bank: 3.96M vs. ESGLF (1.43M). HWAUF has less debt than ESGLF: HWAUF (323K) vs ESGLF (1.48M). ESGLF (0) and HWAUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ESGLFHWAUFESGLF / HWAUF
Capitalization25.1M16M157%
EBITDA-4.72M-910.53K519%
Gain YTD100.14532.667307%
P/E Ratio2.37N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.43M3.96M36%
Total Debt1.48M323K457%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESGLF: Fundamental Ratings
ESGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESGLFHWAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANFGF24.73N/A
N/A
Antofagasta plc
JNBYF1.52N/A
N/A
JNBY Design Ltd.
KBSTF13.80N/A
N/A
Kobe Steel, Ltd.
PXCLF0.03N/A
N/A
Phoenix Copper Limited
APLIF0.01N/A
-1.90%
Appili Therapeutics Inc.

ESGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESGLF and GRYCF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESGLF and GRYCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESGLF
1D Price
Change %
ESGLF100%
N/A
GRYCF - ESGLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.59%
HWAUF - ESGLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.42%
AYASF - ESGLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-5.62%
GMINF - ESGLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-8.03%
CYPMF - ESGLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HWAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWAUF and BKRRF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWAUF and BKRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWAUF
1D Price
Change %
HWAUF100%
+6.42%
BKRRF - HWAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.36%
APGOF - HWAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.24%
TORXF - HWAUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%
DDEJF - HWAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
OCGSF - HWAUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.99%
More