Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGCX vs NPFCX
ESGCX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGCX vs NPFCX
Mirova Global Megatrends C
Price$20.04
Change-$0.70 (-3.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets843.82M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.51
Change-$2.33 (-3.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
ESGCX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGCX vs. NPFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGCX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ESGCX (844M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than ESGCX: NPFCX (0.34) vs ESGCX (0.00). ESGCX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGCX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). ESGCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ESGCX (18.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGCX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGCX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.67 vs. ESGCX (4.48). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. ESGCX (4.49).
| ESGCX | NPFCX | ESGCX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.47 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.47 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.668 | 1.526 | -109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 844M | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | 11.67 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.36 | 37.05 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.49 | 11.69 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement