Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGCX vs FNPFX
ESGCX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts ESGCX vs FNPFX
Mirova Global Megatrends C
Price$20.20
Change+$0.12 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets912.3M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
ESGCX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGCX vs. FNPFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGCX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ESGCX (912M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than ESGCX: FNPFX (0.79) vs ESGCX (0.00). ESGCX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: ESGCX (9 years) vs FNPFX (9 years). ESGCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGCX (18.00). ESGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: ESGCX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.43 vs. ESGCX (7.05). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.38 vs. ESGCX (24.37).
| ESGCX | FNPFX | ESGCX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.41 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.41 | 485% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.021 | 14.863 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 912M | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.05 | 17.43 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.64 | 46.08 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.37 | 44.38 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement