Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGCX vs FNPFX
ESGCX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts ESGCX vs FNPFX
Mirova Global Megatrends C
Price$19.97
Change+$0.14 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets911.65M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$70.26
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
ESGCX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGCX vs. FNPFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGCX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. ESGCX (912M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than ESGCX: FNPFX (0.79) vs ESGCX (0.00). ESGCX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: ESGCX (9 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). ESGCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGCX (18.00). ESGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: ESGCX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. ESGCX (3.26). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.56 vs. ESGCX (28.81).
| ESGCX | FNPFX | ESGCX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.41 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.41 | 485% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.791 | 13.140 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 912M | 156B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 11.63 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.37 | 47.32 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.81 | 47.56 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement