Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESEAX vs RGACX
ESEAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ESEAX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq A
Price$26.60
Change-$6.24 (-19.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets417.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$76.64
Change-$9.33 (-10.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
ESEAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESEAX vs. RGACX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESEAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ESEAX (418M). ESEAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . ESEAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ESEAX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). ESEAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ESEAX (2.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESEAX: RGACX (250) vs ESEAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. ESEAX (-26.60). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 11.01 vs. ESEAX (-12.27).
| ESEAX | RGACX | ESEAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.93 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.93 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.179 | -1.046 | 400% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 418M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.60 | 2.06 | -1,289% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.04 | 42.58 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.27 | 11.01 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.84 | 113.97 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers