Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESEAX vs RGACX
ESEAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ESEAX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq A
Price$32.51
Change-$0.39 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets593.38M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
ESEAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESEAX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESEAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. ESEAX (593M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ESEAX: RGACX (0.07) vs ESEAX (0.00). ESEAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ESEAX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). ESEAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ESEAX (2.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESEAX: RGACX (250) vs ESEAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. ESEAX (-11.61). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. ESEAX (10.89).
| ESEAX | RGACX | ESEAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.996 | 19.364 | -26% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 593M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.61 | 8.31 | -140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.00 | 63.31 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.89 | 37.90 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.44 | 98.36 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement