Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESEAX vs RGACX
ESEAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ESEAX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq A
Price$28.13
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets515.87M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
ESEAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESEAX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESEAX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. ESEAX (516M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ESEAX: RGACX (0.07) vs ESEAX (0.00). ESEAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ESEAX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). ESEAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ESEAX (2.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESEAX: RGACX (250) vs ESEAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. ESEAX (-20.33). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.41 vs. ESEAX (-5.06).
| ESEAX | RGACX | ESEAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.93 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.93 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.770 | 8.807 | -213% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 516M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.33 | 5.61 | -363% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.87 | 64.57 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.06 | 20.41 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.55 | 90.45 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement