Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESEAX vs RGACX
ESEAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ESEAX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq A
Price$32.76
Change+$0.26 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets618.59M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
ESEAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESEAX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESEAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ESEAX (619M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ESEAX: RGACX (0.07) vs ESEAX (0.00). ESEAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ESEAX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). ESEAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ESEAX (2.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESEAX: RGACX (250) vs ESEAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. ESEAX (-9.50). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. ESEAX (16.01).
| ESEAX | RGACX | ESEAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.400 | 17.655 | -31% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 619M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.50 | 11.01 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.20 | 70.57 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.01 | 37.85 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.25 | 96.78 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement