Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESCGX vs RNWHX
ESCGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ESCGX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG C
Price$13.36
Change-$0.04 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.4M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.01
Change+$0.20 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
ESCGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESCGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESCGX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. ESCGX (16.4M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ESCGX: RNWHX (0.91) vs ESCGX (0.09). ESCGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ESCGX (6 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). ESCGX (3.14) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ESCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESCGX: RNWHX (250) vs ESCGX (1000). ESCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.67 vs. RNWHX (19.66). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.11 vs. ESCGX (-1.55).
| ESCGX | RNWHX | ESCGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.72 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.14 | 0.72 | 436% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.516 | 27.348 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.4M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.91 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.67 | 19.66 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.00 | 47.33 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.55 | 19.11 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.80 | - |