Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESCGX vs RNWBX
ESCGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ESCGX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG C
Price$14.54
Change+$1.31 (+9.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.99M
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
ESCGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESCGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESCGX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. ESCGX (18M). ESCGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: ESCGX (1.40) vs RNWBX (0.45). ESCGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ESCGX (6 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). ESCGX (3.14) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). ESCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESCGX: RNWBX (250) vs ESCGX (1000). ESCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.57 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. ESCGX (-5.90).
| ESCGX | RNWBX | ESCGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.66 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.14 | 1.66 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.914 | 5.996 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.45 | 311% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.57 | 26.27 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.22 | 38.81 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.90 | 7.03 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement