Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESCGX vs RNWBX
ESCGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ESCGX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG C
Price$13.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.23M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.32
Change+$0.15 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
ESCGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESCGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESCGX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. ESCGX (16.2M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than ESCGX: RNWBX (0.12) vs ESCGX (0.09). ESCGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ESCGX (6 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). ESCGX (3.14) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ESCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESCGX: RNWBX (250) vs ESCGX (1000). ESCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.27 vs. RNWBX (18.74). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 13.94 vs. ESCGX (-2.79).
| ESCGX | RNWBX | ESCGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.14 | 1.67 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.142 | 25.520 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.2M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.12 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.27 | 18.74 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.51 | 41.51 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.79 | 13.94 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement