ESCA
Price
$14.77
Change
-$0.01 (-0.07%)
Updated
Feb 5, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
204.16M
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAS
Price
$96.59
Change
+$1.93 (+2.04%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
13.56B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESCA vs HAS

Header iconESCA vs HAS Comparison
Open Charts ESCA vs HASBanner chart's image
Escalade
Price$14.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization204.16M
Hasbro
Price$96.59
Change+$1.93 (+2.04%)
Volume$1.81M
Capitalization13.56B
ESCA vs HAS Comparison Chart in %
ESCA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESCA vs. HAS commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESCA is a Buy and HAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (ESCA: $14.78 vs. HAS: $96.59)
Brand notoriety: ESCA and HAS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESCA: 75% vs. HAS: 112%
Market capitalization -- ESCA: $204.16M vs. HAS: $13.56B
ESCA [@Recreational Products] is valued at $204.16M. HAS’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $13.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $28.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESCA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESCA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ESCA and HAS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESCA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESCA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESCA is a better buy in the short-term than HAS.

Price Growth

ESCA (@Recreational Products) experienced а +4.82% price change this week, while HAS (@Recreational Products) price change was +7.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESCA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

HAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-1.32% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($13.6B) has a higher market cap than ESCA($204M). HAS has higher P/E ratio than ESCA: HAS (25.60) vs ESCA (16.08). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 17.793 vs. ESCA (10.776). ESCA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.4M vs. HAS (-72.9M). ESCA has less debt than HAS: ESCA (21.6M) vs HAS (3.35B). HAS has higher revenues than ESCA: HAS (4.36B) vs ESCA (242M).
ESCAHASESCA / HAS
Capitalization204M13.6B2%
EBITDA23.4M-72.9M-32%
Gain YTD10.77617.79361%
P/E Ratio16.0825.6063%
Revenue242M4.36B6%
Total CashN/A621M-
Total Debt21.6M3.35B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESCA vs HAS: Fundamental Ratings
ESCA
HAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
7898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5351
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ESCA's Valuation (14) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as HAS (34). This means that ESCA’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as ESCA (100). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to ESCA’s over the last 12 months.

ESCA's SMR Rating (78) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as HAS (98). This means that ESCA’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESCA (45). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESCA’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as ESCA (53). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to ESCA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESCAHAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESCA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNGZ38.280.55
+1.46%
FirstTrust S&P500 DvrsDiv AristocratsETF
DDFS21.28-0.01
-0.07%
Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 15 Buf ETF -Sep
GFEB41.86-0.05
-0.13%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Feb
PBOC29.24-0.10
-0.35%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Oct
FWD109.21-3.76
-3.33%
AB Disruptors ETF

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been closely correlated with YETI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then YETI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
+2.04%
YETI - HAS
71%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
MAT - HAS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
GOLF - HAS
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.56%
FNKO - HAS
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
ESCA - HAS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
More