It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESALF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHLTRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESALF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLTRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ESALF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -5.71% price change this week, while HLTRF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -3.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +74.65%.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
ESALF | HLTRF | ESALF / HLTRF | |
Capitalization | 18.3B | 154M | 11,883% |
EBITDA | 87.3B | 15.8M | 552,532% |
Gain YTD | -0.389 | 32.714 | -1% |
P/E Ratio | 46.30 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 744B | 61.7M | 1,205,835% |
Total Cash | 268B | 21.2M | 1,264,151% |
Total Debt | 126B | 95.2M | 132,353% |
ESALF | HLTRF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESALF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as HLTRF (29). This means that ESALF’s stock grew similarly to HLTRF’s over the last 12 months.
ESALF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HLTRF (100). This means that ESALF’s stock grew similarly to HLTRF’s over the last 12 months.
ESALF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLTRF (94). This means that ESALF’s stock grew significantly faster than HLTRF’s over the last 12 months.
HLTRF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESALF (85). This means that HLTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESALF’s over the last 12 months.
ESALF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as HLTRF (100). This means that ESALF’s stock grew similarly to HLTRF’s over the last 12 months.
ESALF | HLTRF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% | 3 days ago48% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago38% | 3 days ago44% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago45% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago51% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago70% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago59% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago46% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PAHVX | 7.07 | 0.11 | +1.58% |
PGIM Jennison NextGeneration Glb Opps R6 | |||
MSGSX | 15.81 | 0.14 | +0.89% |
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq R5 | |||
RCGTX | 15.36 | 0.09 | +0.59% |
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C | |||
REQTX | 47.05 | 0.14 | +0.30% |
Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq S | |||
OAYBX | 37.50 | 0.03 | +0.08% |
Oakmark Equity and Income Advisor |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ESALF and ESAIY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESALF and ESAIY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESALF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESALF | 100% | N/A | ||
ESAIY - ESALF | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
KHTRF - ESALF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
DVAX - ESALF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
BLMH - ESALF | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.36% | ||
DBCCF - ESALF | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLTRF has been loosely correlated with PHCUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLTRF jumps, then PHCUF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLTRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HLTRF | 100% | -0.83% | ||
PHCUF - HLTRF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
INCR - HLTRF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
GTBIF - HLTRF | 3% Poorly correlated | +5.01% | ||
ESALF - HLTRF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
INDV - HLTRF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
More |