ESAB
Price
$120.70
Change
-$0.58 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.32B
32 days until earnings call
MEC
Price
$15.81
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
331.26M
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESAB vs MEC

Header iconESAB vs MEC Comparison
Open Charts ESAB vs MECBanner chart's image
ESAB
Price$120.70
Change-$0.58 (-0.48%)
Volume$297.92K
Capitalization7.32B
Mayville Engineering
Price$15.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$126.36K
Capitalization331.26M
ESAB vs MEC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESAB vs. MEC commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESAB is a Buy and MEC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ESAB: $120.70 vs. MEC: $15.81)
Brand notoriety: ESAB and MEC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESAB: 106% vs. MEC: 103%
Market capitalization -- ESAB: $7.32B vs. MEC: $331.26M
ESAB [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $7.32B. MEC’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $331.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESAB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMEC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ESAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MEC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ESAB and MEC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESAB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESAB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MEC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MEC is a better buy in the short-term than ESAB.

Price Growth

ESAB (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +4.38% price change this week, while MEC (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -1.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESAB is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

MEC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (+3.24% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESAB($7.32B) has a higher market cap than MEC($331M). ESAB has higher P/E ratio than MEC: ESAB (25.04) vs MEC (14.99). ESAB YTD gains are higher at: 0.705 vs. MEC (0.573). ESAB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 515M vs. MEC (76.3M). ESAB has more cash in the bank: 291M vs. MEC (183K). MEC has less debt than ESAB: MEC (107M) vs ESAB (1.16B). ESAB has higher revenues than MEC: ESAB (2.73B) vs MEC (556M).
ESABMECESAB / MEC
Capitalization7.32B331M2,211%
EBITDA515M76.3M675%
Gain YTD0.7050.573123%
P/E Ratio25.0414.99167%
Revenue2.73B556M491%
Total Cash291M183K159,016%
Total Debt1.16B107M1,082%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEC: Fundamental Ratings
MEC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
70
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESABMEC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
URE62.090.43
+0.69%
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
BGIG30.260.02
+0.07%
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
CADAUD1.12N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - Australian Dollar
CNYEUR0.12-0.00
-0.03%
China Yuan - Euro
FLDR50.00-0.05
-0.09%
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF

ESAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESAB has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESAB jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESAB
1D Price
Change %
ESAB100%
-0.48%
MLI - ESAB
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
CRS - ESAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
NWPX - ESAB
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
IIIN - ESAB
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATI - ESAB
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
More

MEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEC and GFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEC and GFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEC
1D Price
Change %
MEC100%
N/A
GFF - MEC
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
VMI - MEC
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
TRC - MEC
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
ESAB - MEC
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
CODI - MEC
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
More