ESAB
Price
$111.80
Change
-$1.27 (-1.12%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.79B
116 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFLT
Price
$10.42
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
112.35M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESAB vs GFLT

Header iconESAB vs GFLT Comparison
Open Charts ESAB vs GFLTBanner chart's image
ESAB
Price$111.80
Change-$1.27 (-1.12%)
Volume$372.02K
Capitalization6.79B
GenFlat Holdings
Price$10.42
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$500
Capitalization112.35M
ESAB vs GFLT Comparison Chart in %
ESAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESAB vs. GFLT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESAB is a Hold and GFLT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ESAB: $111.80 vs. GFLT: $10.42)
Brand notoriety: ESAB and GFLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESAB: 75% vs. GFLT: 55%
Market capitalization -- ESAB: $6.79B vs. GFLT: $112.35M
ESAB [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $6.79B. GFLT’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $112.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESAB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFLT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ESAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GFLT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFLT is a better buy in the long-term than ESAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESAB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFLT’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESAB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GFLT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFLT is a better buy in the short-term than ESAB.

Price Growth

ESAB (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -0.16% price change this week, while GFLT (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +3.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESAB is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (+3.83% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESAB($6.79B) has a higher market cap than GFLT($112M). ESAB YTD gains are higher at: -6.563 vs. GFLT (-57.382). ESAB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 507M vs. GFLT (-3.34M). ESAB has more cash in the bank: 47.1M vs. GFLT (164K). GFLT has less debt than ESAB: GFLT (177K) vs ESAB (1.17B). ESAB has higher revenues than GFLT: ESAB (2.74B) vs GFLT (13.1K).
ESABGFLTESAB / GFLT
Capitalization6.79B112M6,060%
EBITDA507M-3.34M-15,202%
Gain YTD-6.563-57.38211%
P/E Ratio25.01N/A-
Revenue2.74B13.1K20,900,763%
Total Cash47.1M164K28,720%
Total Debt1.17B177K659,322%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESABGFLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TYFG48.160.05
+0.10%
Tri County Financial Group Inc.
SNGNF3.50N/A
N/A
Singapore Telecommunications Ltd.
AGZNF17.50N/A
N/A
AEGEAN Airlines
CCYY7.20N/A
N/A
CCCB BANCORP INC.
LOTBY88.00N/A
N/A
Lotus Bakeries NV

ESAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESAB has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESAB jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESAB
1D Price
Change %
ESAB100%
-1.12%
MLI - ESAB
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
NWPX - ESAB
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
PRLB - ESAB
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
RS - ESAB
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
CMC - ESAB
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
More

GFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFLT has been loosely correlated with BEKSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFLT jumps, then BEKSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFLT
1D Price
Change %
GFLT100%
-0.10%
BEKSF - GFLT
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RMTO - GFLT
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPO - GFLT
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
ESAB - GFLT
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
CHTM - GFLT
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More