ERYTF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.45M
GLNS
Price
$0.75
Change
-$0.40 (-34.78%)
Updated
Feb 7 closing price
Capitalization
7.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ERYTF vs GLNS

Header iconERYTF vs GLNS Comparison
Open Charts ERYTF vs GLNSBanner chart's image
EAGLE ROYALTIES
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.67K
Capitalization9.45M
Golden Star Resource
Price$0.75
Change-$0.40 (-34.78%)
Volume$300
Capitalization7.3M
ERYTF vs GLNS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ERYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERYTF vs. GLNS commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERYTF is a Hold and GLNS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ERYTF: $0.08 vs. GLNS: $0.75)
Brand notoriety: ERYTF and GLNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERYTF: 38% vs. GLNS: 100%
Market capitalization -- ERYTF: $9.45M vs. GLNS: $7.3M
ERYTF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $9.45M. GLNS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERYTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGLNS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ERYTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GLNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERYTF is a better buy in the long-term than GLNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERYTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ERYTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ERYTF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.90% price change this week, while GLNS (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERYTF($9.45M) has a higher market cap than GLNS($7.3M). ERYTF YTD gains are higher at: -11.765 vs. GLNS (-34.583).
ERYTFGLNSERYTF / GLNS
Capitalization9.45M7.3M130%
EBITDAN/A-51.28K-
Gain YTD-11.765-34.58334%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A-4-
Total DebtN/A536K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLNS: Fundamental Ratings
GLNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERYTFGLNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DOCMF1.01N/A
N/A
DR MARTENS PLC
AILLI85.80N/A
N/A
Ameren Illinois Company
CCDBF57.48-0.40
-0.69%
CCL Industries Inc.
SYZLF6.20-0.05
-0.74%
Sylogist Ltd.
ODDAF0.12-0.02
-11.77%
Odd Burger Corporation

ERYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ERYTF and GLNS have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ERYTF and GLNS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERYTF
1D Price
Change %
ERYTF100%
-5.90%
GLNS - ERYTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TROYF - ERYTF
10%
Poorly correlated
+25.44%
HMRFF - ERYTF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.65%
FDMIF - ERYTF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
RSGOF - ERYTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GLNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLNS and KSTBF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLNS and KSTBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNS
1D Price
Change %
GLNS100%
N/A
KSTBF - GLNS
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGZ - GLNS
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
SNGCF - GLNS
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
ERYTF - GLNS
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.90%
RGLD - GLNS
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
More