Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERTH vs FWD
ERTH vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts ERTH vs FWD
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
Price$42.75
Change-$0.51 (-1.18%)
Volume$4.04K
Net Assets137.06M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$85.31
Change+$1.86 (+2.23%)
Volume$969
Net Assets716.87M
ERTH vs FWD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERTH vs. FWD commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERTH is a Hold and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 717M vs. ERTH (137M). ERTH has a higher annual dividend yield than FWD: ERTH (5.842) vs FWD (5.379). ERTH was incepted earlier than FWD: ERTH (19 years) vs FWD (2 years). FWD (0.65) and ERTH (0.67) have comparable expense ratios . FWD has a higher turnover ERTH (29.00) vs ERTH (29.00).
| ERTH | FWD | ERTH / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 5.842 | 5.379 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 137M | 717M | 19% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 163.00 | 18% |
| Yield | 0.91 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ERTH | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ERTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERTH has been loosely correlated with CUZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERTH jumps, then CUZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ERTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERTH | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| CUZ - ERTH | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| FSLR - ERTH | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.39% | ||
| NIO - ERTH | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| SGML - ERTH | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| ORA - ERTH | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -1.11% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 77% Closely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| ARM - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| SNPS - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | -3.26% | ||
More | ||||