Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERSMX vs FSMAX
ERSMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ERSMX vs FSMAX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R
Price$33.28
Change+$0.18 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.49B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.51
Change+$0.65 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
ERSMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERSMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERSMX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. ERSMX (14.5B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ERSMX: FSMAX (0.47) vs ERSMX (0.00). ERSMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ERSMX (16 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). ERSMX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ERSMX (9.00) and FSMAX (9.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERSMX: FSMAX (0) vs ERSMX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.33 vs. ERSMX (1.80). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.91 vs. ERSMX (11.98).
| ERSMX | FSMAX | ERSMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.04 | 3,914% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.04 | 3,914% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.337 | 6.195 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 39.2B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.80 | 15.33 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.74 | 51.73 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.98 | 61.91 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.80 | 86.12 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers