Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERSMX vs FSMAX
ERSMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ERSMX vs FSMAX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R
Price$30.76
Change+$0.32 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.99B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.01
Change+$0.91 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
ERSMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERSMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERSMX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. ERSMX (14B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ERSMX: FSMAX (0.44) vs ERSMX (0.00). ERSMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ERSMX (16 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). ERSMX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. ERSMX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERSMX: FSMAX (0) vs ERSMX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.92 vs. ERSMX (-11.56). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.96 vs. ERSMX (4.91).
| ERSMX | FSMAX | ERSMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.04 | 3,914% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.04 | 3,914% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.412 | 11.147 | -49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14B | 41B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.56 | 16.92 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.65 | 71.41 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.91 | 63.96 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.87 | 118.30 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers