Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERSGX vs WCMLX
ERSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ERSGX vs WCMLX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap R
Price$13.30
Change-$0.18 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.81M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
ERSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERSGX has more cash in the bank: 155M vs. WCMLX (41.9M). ERSGX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: ERSGX (0.10) vs WCMLX (0.00). ERSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ERSGX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ERSGX (1.61). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ERSGX (38.00). ERSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ERSGX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.98 vs. ERSGX (-13.68). ERSGX return over 5 years is better than : 5.73 vs. WCMLX (4.74).
| ERSGX | WCMLX | ERSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.99 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.79 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.454 | 6.454 | -100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 41.9M | 370% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.68 | -2.98 | 460% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.82 | 22.89 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.73 | 4.74 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement