ERMAY
Price
$6.70
Change
+$0.45 (+7.20%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.41B
WRSLF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
204.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ERMAY vs WRSLF

Header iconERMAY vs WRSLF Comparison
Open Charts ERMAY vs WRSLFBanner chart's image
Eramet-SLN
Price$6.70
Change+$0.45 (+7.20%)
Volume$7.2K
Capitalization2.41B
Winsome Resources
Price$0.12
Change-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Volume$44.6K
Capitalization204.1M
ERMAY vs WRSLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ERMAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERMAY vs. WRSLF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERMAY is a Hold and WRSLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ERMAY: $6.70 vs. WRSLF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: ERMAY and WRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERMAY: 613% vs. WRSLF: 186%
Market capitalization -- ERMAY: $2.41B vs. WRSLF: $204.1M
ERMAY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.41B. WRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $204.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERMAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWRSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ERMAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERMAY is a better buy in the long-term than WRSLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERMAY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRSLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERMAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WRSLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ERMAY is a better buy in the short-term than WRSLF.

Price Growth

ERMAY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.02% price change this week, while WRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERMAY($2.42B) has a higher market cap than WRSLF($204M). ERMAY YTD gains are higher at: 33.536 vs. WRSLF (-54.972). ERMAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 418M vs. WRSLF (-10.63M). ERMAY has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. WRSLF (13.5M).
ERMAYWRSLFERMAY / WRSLF
Capitalization2.42B204M1,184%
EBITDA418M-10.63M-3,932%
Gain YTD33.536-54.972-61%
P/E Ratio8.18N/A-
Revenue3.98BN/A-
Total Cash1.39B13.5M10,274%
Total Debt2.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERMAY: Fundamental Ratings
ERMAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERMAYWRSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERMAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AHGCX10.940.10
+0.92%
American Century Heritage C
BIOIX56.470.38
+0.68%
Baron Opportunity Instl
DNLVX21.040.10
+0.48%
Dunham Large Cap Value N
GFFDX88.670.28
+0.32%
Invesco Global Focus R5
WGGSX13.47N/A
N/A
Wasatch Global Select Institutional

ERMAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERMAY has been loosely correlated with ERMAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERMAY jumps, then ERMAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERMAY
1D Price
Change %
ERMAY100%
+7.20%
ERMAF - ERMAY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MJDLF - ERMAY
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
WRSLF - ERMAY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAGFF - ERMAY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
IVPAF - ERMAY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
More

WRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WRSLF and IVPAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WRSLF and IVPAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRSLF
1D Price
Change %
WRSLF100%
N/A
IVPAF - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
ERMAY - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.20%
LYSDY - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
CRECF - WRSLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
PILBF - WRSLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
More