ERMAY
Price
$5.97
Change
-$0.08 (-1.32%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.62B
MJDLF
Price
$7.44
Change
+$0.19 (+2.62%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
608.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ERMAY vs MJDLF

Header iconERMAY vs MJDLF Comparison
Open Charts ERMAY vs MJDLFBanner chart's image
Eramet-SLN
Price$5.97
Change-$0.08 (-1.32%)
Volume$1.75K
Capitalization1.62B
Major Drilling Group International
Price$7.44
Change+$0.19 (+2.62%)
Volume$11.51K
Capitalization608.69M
ERMAY vs MJDLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ERMAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERMAY vs. MJDLF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERMAY is a Hold and MJDLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ERMAY: $5.97 vs. MJDLF: $7.44)
Brand notoriety: ERMAY and MJDLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERMAY: 78% vs. MJDLF: 144%
Market capitalization -- ERMAY: $1.62B vs. MJDLF: $608.69M
ERMAY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.62B. MJDLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $608.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERMAY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMJDLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ERMAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MJDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the long-term than ERMAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERMAY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MJDLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERMAY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MJDLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the short-term than ERMAY.

Price Growth

ERMAY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MJDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERMAY($1.62B) has a higher market cap than MJDLF($609M). ERMAY has higher P/E ratio than MJDLF: ERMAY (108.65) vs MJDLF (32.06). MJDLF YTD gains are higher at: 31.413 vs. ERMAY (18.987). ERMAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 119M vs. MJDLF (103M). ERMAY has more cash in the bank: 746M vs. MJDLF (46M). MJDLF has less debt than ERMAY: MJDLF (37.1M) vs ERMAY (2.47B). ERMAY has higher revenues than MJDLF: ERMAY (2.89B) vs MJDLF (728M).
ERMAYMJDLFERMAY / MJDLF
Capitalization1.62B609M266%
EBITDA119M103M116%
Gain YTD18.98731.41360%
P/E Ratio108.6532.06339%
Revenue2.89B728M396%
Total Cash746M46M1,622%
Total Debt2.47B37.1M6,658%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERMAY vs MJDLF: Fundamental Ratings
ERMAY
MJDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7564
SMR RATING
1..100
9685
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
528
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9029

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MJDLF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as ERMAY (86). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to ERMAY’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as ERMAY (75). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to ERMAY’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as ERMAY (96). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to ERMAY’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ERMAY (55). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to ERMAY’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ERMAY (52). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ERMAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERMAYMJDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERMAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JVTNX90.670.32
+0.35%
Janus Henderson Venture N
TIAGX13.65-0.02
-0.15%
Timothy Plan Small/Mid Cap Growth Cl I
GEIZX18.25-0.03
-0.16%
GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Index Inv
HACAX125.59-0.22
-0.17%
Harbor Capital Appreciation Instl
MREGX15.33-0.04
-0.26%
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity R

ERMAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERMAY has been loosely correlated with ERMAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERMAY jumps, then ERMAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERMAY
1D Price
Change %
ERMAY100%
N/A
ERMAF - ERMAY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MJDLF - ERMAY
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.59%
WRSLF - ERMAY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAGFF - ERMAY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
IVPAF - ERMAY
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
More

MJDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MJDLF has been loosely correlated with AOTVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MJDLF jumps, then AOTVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJDLF
1D Price
Change %
MJDLF100%
+2.59%
AOTVF - MJDLF
33%
Loosely correlated
+8.01%
ERMAY - MJDLF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAMZF - MJDLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVPAF - MJDLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
SMDZF - MJDLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More