Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RWMHX
ERLVX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RWMHX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R6
Price$28.58
Change+$1.25 (+4.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.01
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
ERLVX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RWMHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. ERLVX (1.43B). RWMHX pays higher dividends than ERLVX: RWMHX (1.36) vs ERLVX (1.08). ERLVX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: ERLVX (12 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). ERLVX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RWMHX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). ERLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. RWMHX (5.40). ERLVX (38.56) and RWMHX (37.20) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ERLVX | RWMHX | ERLVX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.41 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.41 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.127 | 1.523 | 402% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.36 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.03 | 5.40 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.81 | 30.10 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.56 | 37.20 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.16 | 96.94 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement