Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R6
Price$27.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. ERLVX (1.39B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ERLVX: RMFCX (1.26) vs ERLVX (1.13). ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.70). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. ERLVX (9.51). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.17 vs. ERLVX (35.28).
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.379 | 2.091 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.26 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.51 | 11.33 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.03 | 28.04 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.28 | 44.17 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.18 | 109.86 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement