Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R6
Price$26.90
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.42B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. ERLVX (1.42B). RMFCX (1.27) and ERLVX (1.23) have matching dividends . ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (11 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.70). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. ERLVX (7.70). RMFCX (61.83) and ERLVX (60.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.092 | 9.596 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.27 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.70 | 11.47 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.79 | 29.27 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.31 | 61.83 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.43 | 79.21 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement