Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R6
Price$27.22
Change+$0.11 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. ERLVX (1.39B). RMFCX (1.18) and ERLVX (1.13) have matching dividends . ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.70). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. ERLVX (6.17). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. ERLVX (37.37).
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.625 | 9.696 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.18 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.17 | 8.05 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.92 | 28.89 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.37 | 46.17 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.46 | 91.60 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement