Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R6
Price$25.88
Change-$0.26 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.6B
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. ERLVX (1.39B). RMFCX (1.31) and ERLVX (1.31) have matching dividends . ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (11 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.70). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. ERLVX (3.62). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. ERLVX (53.01).
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.069 | 6.021 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 107B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.31 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | 8.70 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.20 | 28.43 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.01 | 59.85 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.35 | 69.75 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement