ERLFF
Price
$1.75
Change
-$0.06 (-3.31%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
198.35M
16 days until earnings call
TRBMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
48.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ERLFF vs TRBMF

Header iconERLFF vs TRBMF Comparison
Open Charts ERLFF vs TRBMFBanner chart's image
Entree Resources
Price$1.75
Change-$0.06 (-3.31%)
Volume$9.19K
Capitalization198.35M
Torq Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization48.29M
ERLFF vs TRBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ERLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERLFF vs. TRBMF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLFF is a Hold and TRBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ERLFF: $1.75 vs. TRBMF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: ERLFF and TRBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERLFF: 42% vs. TRBMF: 27%
Market capitalization -- ERLFF: $198.35M vs. TRBMF: $48.29M
ERLFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $198.35M. TRBMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $48.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ERLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERLFF is a better buy in the long-term than TRBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERLFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRBMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERLFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRBMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRBMF is a better buy in the short-term than ERLFF.

Price Growth

ERLFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.40% price change this week, while TRBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

ERLFF is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERLFF($198M) has a higher market cap than TRBMF($48.3M). TRBMF YTD gains are higher at: 47.760 vs. ERLFF (3.097). ERLFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.93M vs. TRBMF (-13.86M). TRBMF has more cash in the bank: 14.3M vs. ERLFF (5.94M). TRBMF has less debt than ERLFF: TRBMF (2.04M) vs ERLFF (11.8M). ERLFF (0) and TRBMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ERLFFTRBMFERLFF / TRBMF
Capitalization198M48.3M410%
EBITDA-8.93M-13.86M64%
Gain YTD3.09747.7606%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash5.94M14.3M42%
Total Debt11.8M2.04M579%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERLFF vs TRBMF: Fundamental Ratings
ERLFF
TRBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ERLFF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRBMF (60). This means that ERLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

ERLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRBMF (100). This means that ERLFF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

ERLFF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as TRBMF (100). This means that ERLFF’s stock grew similarly to TRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

ERLFF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as TRBMF (50). This means that ERLFF’s stock grew similarly to TRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

ERLFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TRBMF (100). This means that ERLFF’s stock grew similarly to TRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERLFFTRBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HADAX31.540.14
+0.45%
Hartford Balanced HLS IA
TCLCX22.600.10
+0.44%
Nuveen Large Cap Value A
LSVQX18.860.06
+0.32%
LSV Small Cap Value Institutional
BALSX10.060.03
+0.30%
BlackRock U.S. Insights Lon/Shr Eq Inv A
SSILX14.01-0.08
-0.57%
State Street International Stock Sel A

ERLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ERLFF and PWRMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ERLFF and PWRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERLFF
1D Price
Change %
ERLFF100%
-3.45%
PWRMF - ERLFF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
LUNMF - ERLFF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
PILBF - ERLFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
TRBMF - ERLFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOSYF - ERLFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRBMF and NKGFF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRBMF and NKGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRBMF
1D Price
Change %
TRBMF100%
N/A
NKGFF - TRBMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.68%
AAGFF - TRBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
NRGYF - TRBMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMCXF - TRBMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
CSCCF - TRBMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
More