ERLFF
Price
$1.55
Change
+$0.02 (+1.31%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
198.35M
37 days until earnings call
ERMAF
Price
$54.00
Change
-$0.76 (-1.39%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.41B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ERLFF vs ERMAF

Header iconERLFF vs ERMAF Comparison
Open Charts ERLFF vs ERMAFBanner chart's image
Entree Resources
Price$1.55
Change+$0.02 (+1.31%)
Volume$3.56K
Capitalization198.35M
Eramet-SLN
Price$54.00
Change-$0.76 (-1.39%)
Volume$9
Capitalization2.41B
ERLFF vs ERMAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ERLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ERMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERLFF vs. ERMAF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLFF is a StrongBuy and ERMAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ERLFF: $1.55 vs. ERMAF: $54.00)
Brand notoriety: ERLFF and ERMAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERLFF: 18% vs. ERMAF: 91%
Market capitalization -- ERLFF: $198.35M vs. ERMAF: $2.41B
ERLFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $198.35M. ERMAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileERMAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ERLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ERMAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERLFF is a better buy in the long-term than ERMAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERLFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ERMAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERLFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ERMAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ERLFF is a better buy in the short-term than ERMAF.

Price Growth

ERLFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.31% price change this week, while ERMAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

ERLFF is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERMAF($2.42B) has a higher market cap than ERLFF($198M). ERMAF YTD gains are higher at: -5.006 vs. ERLFF (-8.555). ERMAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 418M vs. ERLFF (-8.93M). ERMAF has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. ERLFF (5.94M). ERLFF has less debt than ERMAF: ERLFF (11.8M) vs ERMAF (2.1B). ERMAF has higher revenues than ERLFF: ERMAF (3.98B) vs ERLFF (0).
ERLFFERMAFERLFF / ERMAF
Capitalization198M2.42B8%
EBITDA-8.93M418M-2%
Gain YTD-8.555-5.006171%
P/E RatioN/A8.48-
Revenue03.98B-
Total Cash5.94M1.39B0%
Total Debt11.8M2.1B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERLFF vs ERMAF: Fundamental Ratings
ERLFF
ERMAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1779
SMR RATING
1..100
9496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5580
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ERMAF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as ERLFF (20). This means that ERMAF’s stock grew similarly to ERLFF’s over the last 12 months.

ERLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ERMAF (79). This means that ERLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ERMAF’s over the last 12 months.

ERLFF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ERMAF (96). This means that ERLFF’s stock grew similarly to ERMAF’s over the last 12 months.

ERLFF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as ERMAF (80). This means that ERLFF’s stock grew similarly to ERMAF’s over the last 12 months.

ERMAF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ERLFF (100). This means that ERMAF’s stock grew significantly faster than ERLFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERLFFERMAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ERMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIPMX23.840.29
+1.23%
Champlain Mid Cap Adv
SWPPX97.030.82
+0.85%
Schwab® S&P 500 Index
LVOSX18.580.13
+0.70%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R4
FTHMX26.570.17
+0.64%
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Eq Inst
CVCFX15.610.07
+0.45%
Victory Pioneer Disciplined Value C

ERLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ERLFF and PWRMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ERLFF and PWRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERLFF
1D Price
Change %
ERLFF100%
+1.47%
PWRMF - ERLFF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
LUNMF - ERLFF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
PILBF - ERLFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+9.60%
TRBMF - ERLFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
FOSYF - ERLFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More

ERMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERMAF has been loosely correlated with ERMAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERMAF jumps, then ERMAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERMAF
1D Price
Change %
ERMAF100%
N/A
ERMAY - ERMAF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ERVFF - ERMAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUUNF - ERMAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESKYF - ERMAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+19.46%
ERLFF - ERMAF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
More