ERKH
Price
$14.35
Change
+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
14.72M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
FMFP
Price
$12.80
Change
+$0.40 (+3.23%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
36.22M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ERKH vs FMFP

Header iconERKH vs FMFP Comparison
Open Charts ERKH vs FMFPBanner chart's image
Eureka Homestead Ban
Price$14.35
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization14.72M
First Community Financial
Price$12.80
Change+$0.40 (+3.23%)
Volume$514
Capitalization36.22M
ERKH vs FMFP Comparison Chart in %
ERKH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERKH vs. FMFP commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERKH is a Hold and FMFP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (ERKH: $14.35 vs. FMFP: $12.80)
Brand notoriety: ERKH and FMFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERKH: 4% vs. FMFP: 66%
Market capitalization -- ERKH: $14.72M vs. FMFP: $36.22M
ERKH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.72M. FMFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $36.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERKH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMFP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ERKH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FMFP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMFP is a better buy in the long-term than ERKH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERKH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMFP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERKH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FMFP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ERKH is a better buy in the short-term than FMFP.

Price Growth

ERKH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.37% price change this week, while FMFP (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.05% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMFP($36.2M) has a higher market cap than ERKH($14.7M). ERKH has higher P/E ratio than FMFP: ERKH (239.17) vs FMFP (32.82). FMFP YTD gains are higher at: 6.753 vs. ERKH (-19.608).
ERKHFMFPERKH / FMFP
Capitalization14.7M36.2M41%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.6086.753-290%
P/E Ratio239.1732.82729%
RevenueN/A19.5M-
Total CashN/A13.4M-
Total DebtN/A15.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERKH vs FMFP: Fundamental Ratings
ERKH
FMFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52100
SMR RATING
1..100
9286
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5739
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5020

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMFP's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as ERKH (99). This means that FMFP’s stock grew similarly to ERKH’s over the last 12 months.

ERKH's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMFP (100). This means that ERKH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMFP’s over the last 12 months.

FMFP's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as ERKH (92). This means that FMFP’s stock grew similarly to ERKH’s over the last 12 months.

FMFP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as ERKH (59). This means that FMFP’s stock grew similarly to ERKH’s over the last 12 months.

FMFP's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ERKH (57). This means that FMFP’s stock grew similarly to ERKH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERKHFMFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERKH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABCCF6.50N/A
N/A
ABC Arbitrage SA
NAUH0.05N/A
N/A
National American University Holdings, Inc.
AKESF16.04-0.16
-0.99%
AKESO INC.
NDGPF0.67-0.01
-1.31%
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.
FCSMF0.38-0.02
-6.01%
Focus Graphite, Inc.

ERKH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ERKH and HRGG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ERKH and HRGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERKH
1D Price
Change %
ERKH100%
+0.11%
HRGG - ERKH
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - ERKH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCBC - ERKH
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
CRZBF - ERKH
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.27%
MBKL - ERKH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FMFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMFP and SPXXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMFP and SPXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMFP
1D Price
Change %
FMFP100%
N/A
SPXXF - FMFP
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNBI - FMFP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBTN - FMFP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCN - FMFP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERKH - FMFP
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%