ERFSF
Price
$78.97
Change
+$8.51 (+12.08%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RGEN
Price
$146.00
Change
-$4.23 (-2.82%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.46B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ERFSF vs RGEN

Header iconERFSF vs RGEN Comparison
Open Charts ERFSF vs RGENBanner chart's image
Eurofins Scientific Nante
Price$78.97
Change+$8.51 (+12.08%)
Volume$32.88K
Capitalization14.07B
Repligen
Price$146.00
Change-$4.23 (-2.82%)
Volume$19.44K
Capitalization8.46B
ERFSF vs RGEN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERFSF vs. RGEN commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERFSF is a Hold and RGEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (ERFSF: $78.97 vs. RGEN: $150.23)
Brand notoriety: ERFSF and RGEN are both not notable
ERFSF represents the Medical Specialties, while RGEN is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERFSF: 547% vs. RGEN: 168%
Market capitalization -- ERFSF: $14.07B vs. RGEN: $8.46B
ERFSF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $14.07B. RGEN’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $8.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $169.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $12.14B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $11.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERFSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGEN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ERFSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGEN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERFSF is a better buy in the long-term than RGEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERFSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGEN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERFSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGEN is a better buy in the short-term than ERFSF.

Price Growth

ERFSF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -7.93% price change this week, while RGEN (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -8.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -4.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.98%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

RGEN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-4.30% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.34% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERFSF($14.1B) has a higher market cap than RGEN($8.46B). RGEN has higher P/E ratio than ERFSF: RGEN (7510.50) vs ERFSF (29.49). ERFSF YTD gains are higher at: 7.736 vs. RGEN (-8.318). ERFSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.46B vs. RGEN (121M). ERFSF (753M) and RGEN (749M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RGEN has less debt than ERFSF: RGEN (689M) vs ERFSF (4.11B). ERFSF has higher revenues than RGEN: ERFSF (7.14B) vs RGEN (708M).
ERFSFRGENERFSF / RGEN
Capitalization14.1B8.46B167%
EBITDA1.46B121M1,210%
Gain YTD7.736-8.318-93%
P/E Ratio29.497510.500%
Revenue7.14B708M1,009%
Total Cash753M749M101%
Total Debt4.11B689M597%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERFSF vs RGEN: Fundamental Ratings
ERFSF
RGEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5761
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4556
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4153
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ERFSF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGEN (97) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ERFSF’s stock grew significantly faster than RGEN’s over the last 12 months.

ERFSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RGEN (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ERFSF’s stock grew similarly to RGEN’s over the last 12 months.

RGEN's SMR Rating (90) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ERFSF (92) in the null industry. This means that RGEN’s stock grew similarly to ERFSF’s over the last 12 months.

ERFSF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as RGEN (56) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ERFSF’s stock grew similarly to RGEN’s over the last 12 months.

ERFSF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as RGEN (53) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ERFSF’s stock grew similarly to RGEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERFSFRGEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERFSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RGEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HVAC35.550.70
+2.01%
Advisorshares HVAC And Industrials ETF
VCLN28.900.56
+1.99%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF
NVBW34.04-0.17
-0.50%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF
SIXO35.00-0.22
-0.62%
AllianzIM US Equity 6M Bfr10 Apr/Oct ETF
FHLC73.89-0.69
-0.93%
Fidelity MSCI Health Care ETF

ERFSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ERFSF and RGEN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ERFSF and RGEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERFSF
1D Price
Change %
ERFSF100%
-1.97%
RGEN - ERFSF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
KIDS - ERFSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
SAUHY - ERFSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
BFLY - ERFSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
SOAGY - ERFSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.02%
More

RGEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGEN has been closely correlated with DHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGEN jumps, then DHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGEN
1D Price
Change %
RGEN100%
-0.59%
DHR - RGEN
67%
Closely correlated
-3.05%
A - RGEN
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
BIO - RGEN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
BLFS - RGEN
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
MTD - RGEN
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
More