EREPF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.07M
SVGAF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.06 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EREPF vs SVGAF

Header iconEREPF vs SVGAF Comparison
Open Charts EREPF vs SVGAFBanner chart's image
Zonte Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization5.07M
Silver Grail Resources
Price$0.06
Change-$0.06 (-50.00%)
Volume$31.3K
Capitalization3.66M
EREPF vs SVGAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EREPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EREPF vs. SVGAF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EREPF is a Hold and SVGAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EREPF: $0.03 vs. SVGAF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: EREPF and SVGAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EREPF: 8% vs. SVGAF: 518%
Market capitalization -- EREPF: $5.07M vs. SVGAF: $3.66M
EREPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.07M. SVGAF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EREPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVGAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EREPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVGAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EREPF and SVGAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EREPF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVGAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EREPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVGAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVGAF is a better buy in the short-term than EREPF.

Price Growth

EREPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.88% price change this week, while SVGAF (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EREPF($5.07M) has a higher market cap than SVGAF($3.66M). SVGAF YTD gains are higher at: 100.000 vs. EREPF (-20.000). SVGAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -39.87K vs. EREPF (-525.52K). SVGAF has more cash in the bank: 237K vs. EREPF (173K). EREPF (0) and SVGAF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EREPFSVGAFEREPF / SVGAF
Capitalization5.07M3.66M139%
EBITDA-525.52K-39.87K1,318%
Gain YTD-20.000100.000-20%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash173K237K73%
Total Debt0N/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EREPF vs SVGAF: Fundamental Ratings
EREPF
SVGAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SVGAF's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as EREPF (91). This means that SVGAF’s stock grew similarly to EREPF’s over the last 12 months.

SVGAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EREPF (100). This means that SVGAF’s stock grew similarly to EREPF’s over the last 12 months.

EREPF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as SVGAF (94). This means that EREPF’s stock grew similarly to SVGAF’s over the last 12 months.

SVGAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EREPF (88). This means that SVGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EREPF’s over the last 12 months.

EREPF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVGAF (99). This means that EREPF’s stock grew significantly faster than SVGAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EREPFSVGAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EREPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBBK18.790.79
+4.39%
PB Bankshares
NRP94.301.24
+1.33%
Natural Resource Partners LP
LNC34.570.05
+0.14%
Lincoln National Corp
PANW200.57-1.77
-0.87%
Palo Alto Networks Inc
NOTV1.70-0.14
-7.61%
Inotiv

EREPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EREPF has been loosely correlated with SVGAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EREPF jumps, then SVGAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EREPF
1D Price
Change %
EREPF100%
-16.88%
SVGAF - EREPF
36%
Loosely correlated
-50.00%
LVGLF - EREPF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
CLLEF - EREPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMGF - EREPF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
ETFLF - EREPF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
More

SVGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVGAF has been loosely correlated with EREPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVGAF jumps, then EREPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVGAF
1D Price
Change %
SVGAF100%
-50.00%
EREPF - SVGAF
36%
Loosely correlated
-16.88%
NPTLF - SVGAF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZMPLF - SVGAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STPGF - SVGAF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
SSVFF - SVGAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
More