EREPF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.07M
LVGLF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EREPF vs LVGLF

Header iconEREPF vs LVGLF Comparison
Open Charts EREPF vs LVGLFBanner chart's image
Zonte Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization5.07M
LAKE VICTORIA GOLD
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.43K
CapitalizationN/A
EREPF vs LVGLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EREPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EREPF vs. LVGLF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EREPF is a Hold and LVGLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EREPF: $0.03 vs. LVGLF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: EREPF and LVGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EREPF: 8% vs. LVGLF: 16%
Market capitalization -- EREPF: $5.07M vs. LVGLF: $0
EREPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.07M. LVGLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EREPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVGLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EREPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LVGLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LVGLF is a better buy in the long-term than EREPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EREPF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVGLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EREPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LVGLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LVGLF is a better buy in the short-term than EREPF.

Price Growth

EREPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.88% price change this week, while LVGLF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVGLF YTD gains are higher at: 31.609 vs. EREPF (-20.000).
EREPFLVGLFEREPF / LVGLF
Capitalization5.07MN/A-
EBITDA-525.52KN/A-
Gain YTD-20.00031.609-63%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash173KN/A-
Total Debt0N/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EREPF vs LVGLF: Fundamental Ratings
EREPF
LVGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LVGLF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EREPF (91). This means that LVGLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EREPF’s over the last 12 months.

LVGLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EREPF (100). This means that LVGLF’s stock grew similarly to EREPF’s over the last 12 months.

EREPF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (94). This means that EREPF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

LVGLF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EREPF (88). This means that LVGLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EREPF’s over the last 12 months.

EREPF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LVGLF (100). This means that EREPF’s stock grew significantly faster than LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EREPFLVGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EREPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIRI22.560.05
+0.22%
SiriusXM Holdings Inc
SBFM1.46-0.01
-0.68%
Sunshine Biopharma Inc
KVHI5.26-0.04
-0.75%
KVH Industries
HAFN5.08-0.10
-1.93%
Hafnia Limited
RBBN3.95-0.08
-1.99%
Ribbon Communications

EREPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EREPF has been loosely correlated with SVGAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EREPF jumps, then SVGAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EREPF
1D Price
Change %
EREPF100%
-16.88%
SVGAF - EREPF
36%
Loosely correlated
-50.00%
LVGLF - EREPF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
CLLEF - EREPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMGF - EREPF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
ETFLF - EREPF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
More

LVGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVGLF has been loosely correlated with EREPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LVGLF jumps, then EREPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVGLF
1D Price
Change %
LVGLF100%
-0.07%
EREPF - LVGLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-16.88%
VLMGF - LVGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.98%
PLGDF - LVGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
CLLEF - LVGLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGLCF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
More