EREPF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.36M
FFOXF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EREPF vs FFOXF

Header iconEREPF vs FFOXF Comparison
Open Charts EREPF vs FFOXFBanner chart's image
Zonte Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16K
Capitalization2.36M
Firefox Gold
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization8.14M
EREPF vs FFOXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EREPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EREPF vs. FFOXF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EREPF is a Hold and FFOXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (EREPF: $0.03 vs. FFOXF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: EREPF and FFOXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EREPF: 117% vs. FFOXF: 8%
Market capitalization -- EREPF: $2.36M vs. FFOXF: $8.14M
EREPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.36M. FFOXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EREPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFOXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EREPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFOXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFOXF is a better buy in the long-term than EREPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EREPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFOXF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EREPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FFOXF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EREPF is a better buy in the short-term than FFOXF.

Price Growth

EREPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FFOXF (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFOXF($8.14M) has a higher market cap than EREPF($2.36M). FFOXF YTD gains are higher at: 69.636 vs. EREPF (-20.000). EREPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -470.83K vs. FFOXF (-1.98M). EREPF has more cash in the bank: 238K vs. FFOXF (187K). EREPF (0) and FFOXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EREPFFFOXFEREPF / FFOXF
Capitalization2.36M8.14M29%
EBITDA-470.83K-1.98M24%
Gain YTD-20.00069.636-29%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash238K187K127%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EREPF: Fundamental Ratings
EREPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EREPFFFOXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EREPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SYM55.611.40
+2.58%
Symbotic
PEP145.211.29
+0.90%
PepsiCo
FOA24.610.13
+0.53%
Finance of America Companies
FUBO3.68-0.02
-0.54%
fuboTV
ICMB2.70-0.05
-1.82%
Investcorp Credit Management BDC

EREPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EREPF has been loosely correlated with LVGLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EREPF jumps, then LVGLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EREPF
1D Price
Change %
EREPF100%
N/A
LVGLF - EREPF
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
FFMGF - EREPF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
FFOXF - EREPF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
EQTRF - EREPF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+13.89%
FMANF - EREPF
-8%
Poorly correlated
-2.41%

FFOXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFOXF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFOXF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFOXF
1D Price
Change %
FFOXF100%
-4.31%
CALRF - FFOXF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSISF - FFOXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSUPF - FFOXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
OMMSF - FFOXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
GGLDF - FFOXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.14%
More