Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERBCX vs RWIHX
ERBCX vs RWIHX Comparison
Open Charts ERBCX vs RWIHX
Eaton Vance RBA Equity Strategy Fd Cl C
Price$19.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets633.99M
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R5E
Price$72.65
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.49B
ERBCX vs RWIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERBCX vs. RWIHX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERBCX is a Buy and RWIHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIHX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. ERBCX (634M). RWIHX pays higher dividends than ERBCX: RWIHX (1.64) vs ERBCX (0.00). ERBCX was incepted earlier than RWIHX: ERBCX (15 years) vs RWIHX (10 years). ERBCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than RWIHX (0.56). ERBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RWIHX (27.00). RWIHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBCX: RWIHX (250) vs ERBCX (1000). RWIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.66 vs. ERBCX (8.26). RWIHX return over 5 years is better than : 48.57 vs. ERBCX (15.37).
| ERBCX | RWIHX | ERBCX / RWIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.56 | 366% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.56 | 366% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.666 | 15.627 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 634M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.26 | 11.66 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.92 | 41.97 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.37 | 48.57 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement