Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERBCX vs FWGIX
ERBCX vs FWGIX Comparison
Open Charts ERBCX vs FWGIX
Eaton Vance RBA Equity Strategy Fd Cl C
Price$19.29
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets672.74M
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc F3
Price$72.48
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.34B
ERBCX vs FWGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERBCX vs. FWGIX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERBCX is a Buy and FWGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWGIX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. ERBCX (673M). FWGIX pays higher dividends than ERBCX: FWGIX (1.77) vs ERBCX (0.00). ERBCX was incepted earlier than FWGIX: ERBCX (15 years) vs FWGIX (9 years). ERBCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FWGIX (0.41). ERBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FWGIX (27.00). ERBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWGIX: ERBCX (1000) vs FWGIX (1000000). FWGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.19 vs. ERBCX (9.23). FWGIX return over 5 years is better than : 53.11 vs. ERBCX (18.77).
| ERBCX | FWGIX | ERBCX / FWGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.41 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.41 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.045 | 15.237 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 673M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.77 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 14.19 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.40 | 52.35 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.77 | 53.11 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement