Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERBCX vs FWGIX
ERBCX vs FWGIX Comparison
Open Charts ERBCX vs FWGIX
Eaton Vance RBA Equity Strategy Fd Cl C
Price$18.96
Change+$0.10 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets672.74M
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc F3
Price$71.56
Change+$0.46 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.98B
ERBCX vs FWGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERBCX vs. FWGIX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERBCX is a Buy and FWGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWGIX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. ERBCX (673M). FWGIX pays higher dividends than ERBCX: FWGIX (1.77) vs ERBCX (0.00). ERBCX was incepted earlier than FWGIX: ERBCX (15 years) vs FWGIX (8 years). ERBCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FWGIX (0.41). ERBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FWGIX (27.00). ERBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWGIX: ERBCX (1000) vs FWGIX (1000000). FWGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. ERBCX (5.86). FWGIX return over 5 years is better than : 54.88 vs. ERBCX (20.71).
| ERBCX | FWGIX | ERBCX / FWGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.41 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.41 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.179 | 13.775 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 673M | 136B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.77 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.86 | 9.74 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.38 | 51.57 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.71 | 54.88 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement