Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERASX vs RRMGX
ERASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$37.26
Change-$2.53 (-6.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.37B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$84.36
Change-$5.84 (-6.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
ERASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. ERASX (11.4B). ERASX pays higher dividends than RRMGX: ERASX (0.13) vs RRMGX (0.00). ERASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: ERASX (12 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than ERASX (0.81). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ERASX (9.00). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: RRMGX (2500) vs ERASX (5000000). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.90 vs. ERASX (-11.77). ERASX return over 5 years is better than : 0.69 vs. RRMGX (-19.78).
| ERASX | RRMGX | ERASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.29 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.29 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.529 | 0.958 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 25.1B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.77 | -6.90 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.72 | -3.00 | -91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.69 | -19.78 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.67 | 38.97 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers